|
Post by Prince Namor on May 13, 2017 16:29:52 GMT -8
Nothing like listening to a whore preach virtue. Wait, who's the whore here? Marvel!
|
|
|
Post by Prince Namor on May 13, 2017 16:30:50 GMT -8
Well now Jim Starlin has thrown his hat in...
|
|
|
Post by Prince Namor on May 13, 2017 16:31:24 GMT -8
Haven't we seen this backlash coming?
Has CGC been proactive enough to try and keep it from growing?
If not, they may want to start quickly, because I have a feeling it's about to get worse.
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on May 14, 2017 6:16:07 GMT -8
Haven't we seen this backlash coming? Has CGC been proactive enough to try and keep it from growing? If not, they may want to start quickly, because I have a feeling it's about to get worse. It really does seem to feel like a movement now. This 'anti-CGC' attitude appears to be gaining traction with the artists.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2017 7:55:20 GMT -8
Haven't we seen this backlash coming? Has CGC been proactive enough to try and keep it from growing? If not, they may want to start quickly, because I have a feeling it's about to get worse. It really does seem to feel like a movement now. This 'anti-CGC' attitude appears to be gaining traction with the artists. No one is willing to explain to these creators what the SS program is or how it works. Until and if that happens, this will continue to spiral out of control, and create a wedge between fans and creators. Not smart. Are these creators really this naïve...? It would appear so. Do they really think people haven't been selling their signatures since a creator first signed his work...? Why are these people so ignorant of these things? The answer, of course, is that they are creators, not MBAs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2017 7:58:26 GMT -8
"SkypinkblulovesCBCS"
Heh.
|
|
|
Post by Siggy's Tar Dust® on May 14, 2017 8:28:10 GMT -8
It really does seem to feel like a movement now. This 'anti-CGC' attitude appears to be gaining traction with the artists. No one is willing to explain to these creators what the SS program is or how it works. Until and if that happens, this will continue to spiral out of control, and create a wedge between fans and creators. Not smart. Are these creators really this naïve...? It would appear so. Do they really think people haven't been selling their signatures since a creator first signed his work...? Why are these people so ignorant of these things? The answer, of course, is that they are creators, not MBAs. Someone must bave plopped 20 copies of Strange Tales 178 in front of him on the wrong day.
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on May 14, 2017 8:51:41 GMT -8
No one is willing to explain to these creators what the SS program is or how it works. Until and if that happens, this will continue to spiral out of control, and create a wedge between fans and creators. Not smart. Are these creators really this naïve...? It would appear so. Do they really think people haven't been selling their signatures since a creator first signed his work...? Why are these people so ignorant of these things? The answer, of course, is that they are creators, not MBAs. Someone must bave plopped 20 copies of Strange Tales 178 in front of him on the wrong day. I went over to Starlin's Facebook to see if he said anything further. Seems like CGC did some inappropriate things (I'm totally shocked...shocked I say. ) and pissed him off... linkBut in the end, it's hard to read this without coming to the conclusion that Starlin's motivation is purely financial...rather than having anything to do with 'true fans.' It's sad really. Throw a couple bucks on the ground and watch people fight over it. Maybe we should create a Kickstarter to see what we could get him to do for a thousand bucks. (Yeah...ok...that was kinda mean.)
|
|
|
Post by Siggy's Tar Dust® on May 14, 2017 10:30:33 GMT -8
This is really unfortunate. I don't know if he's planning to be at SDCC, but if so and I can't get a Sig from him personally, I'm gonna be sad . I wonder if this just means he won't sign books if it's being witnessed. Hopefully he'll sign if he gets an 'Ordinary Joe' vibe.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2017 18:58:56 GMT -8
Many things wrong here, and no correction from anyone. First, "half of that is publisher profit" isn't even remotely true. These are the words of someone who might be anti-capitalist. In any event, no, that's not true at all. Distributors (or, in this case, Diamond) buy the books from the publishers at about 60% off of cover price, right out of the gate. A $1 comic was sold by the publisher for 40 cents. So that's wrong. Then, out of those 40 cents, the publisher has to pay everyone, from the creators to the printers to the editors to the sales dept, etc. Creators, depending on their sales numbers, usually made about 1-3 cents a copy. Not bad, if you're selling 100,000 copies a month in the 80's, which was fairly common. The rest of this guy's numbers are pure speculation, and bear little resemblance to reality. Here's a good article about the actual costs of publishing comics and who gets what: www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/new-titles/adult-announcements/article/3110-the-kirkman-bendis-debates-let-s-do-the-math.htmlWhy would you send anything "back to them" in the first place? You're not buying the artists' work: you're buying a reproduction of the artists' work: in other words, a copy. I'm not selling their "creation"...I'm selling a copy of it. I no more owe the creator for what I do with my copy of his/her work than he/she owes me for buying it. And "happiness and enjoyment" is relative. What if I did NOT get "happiness and enjoyment" from the book? Can I return it and get my money back? Most of the time, the answer is a resounding no. And what is this "you also got the ability to re-sell their (copy of) their creation for 100% of the revenue"...? First, that doesn't make any sense prima facie. I will assume the poster means that you can re-sell the copy for what you paid for it, which, of course, isn't at all true most of the time. Not 17 cents. They haven't "given" anyone anything. They have SOLD their work to willing consumers of it, at a mutually agreed upon price. Not entirely, since what you're doing is patronizing their art...that is, buying their product, which enables them to create more of it. But I agree with the sentiments expressed broadly, here. Another hint of anti-capitalism. The "commodification" of everything is what keeps the civilization intact and running. Being offended because people don't share your "share and share alike" views is dangerous to civilization, because it fuels jealousy, greed (which is thinking that someone else has something you don't think they deserve), resentment, bitterness, and eventually anger. Rather, give without expectation in return (which is true giving), and pay for what has value to you, and you will never be upset at what anyone else has or does not have. True. However, it is not unreasonable to remind the creator that their continuing employment has been made possible by the people who purchase their work. It's not reasonable to expect something "for free" from the creator...see above...but it is reasonable for the creator to keep in mind those who do support them.
|
|
slym2none
TCBF Member
Joined: December 2016
Posts: 3,540
|
Post by slym2none on May 14, 2017 22:46:13 GMT -8
Good to see you posting again, OS!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2017 21:06:33 GMT -8
Good to see you posting again, OS! Posting on the CGC board? It is only temporary, and only on that topic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2017 21:07:54 GMT -8
By the way....Doofus510 continues to post irrational, baiting commentary, as does vak. Such a waste of time.
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on May 16, 2017 7:38:34 GMT -8
Jim Starlin 5/14/17 link
|
|
|
Post by Siggy's Tar Dust® on May 16, 2017 8:05:43 GMT -8
Every impression I'm getting says if I approached him with a book or two, asking him to inscribe them to me on the first page, he'll be happy to do it.
|
|