It's great work you're doing.
It's great work you're doing.
Either way, saying they collapsed because "socialism" is an extreme oversimplification of the issues they have, but it's simplified enough to stir up fear amongst a certain populace.
It's great work you're doing.
Either way, saying they collapsed because "socialism" is an extreme oversimplification of the issues they have, but it's simplified enough to stir up fear amongst a certain populace.
The US has had social safety net programs for years and I wouldn't call us socialist.
Either way, saying they collapsed because "socialism" is an extreme oversimplification of the issues they have, but it's simplified enough to stir up fear amongst a certain populace.
The US has had social safety net programs for years and I wouldn't call us socialist.
The US has had social safety net programs for years and I wouldn't call us socialist.
Can you give an example of a first world country where this has happened?
From the 1950s to the early 1980s, the Venezuelan economy, which was buoyed by high oil prices, was one of the strongest and most prosperous in South America.
Then socialism came along. Now 94.5% of the population is living in poverty based on income, out of which 76.6% lives under extreme poverty, the highest figure ever recorded in the country.
Now theyre eatin rats.
Can you give an example of a first world country where this has happened?
From the 1950s to the early 1980s, the Venezuelan economy, which was buoyed by high oil prices, was one of the strongest and most prosperous in South America.
Then socialism came along. Now 94.5% of the population is living in poverty based on income, out of which 76.6% lives under extreme poverty, the highest figure ever recorded in the country.
Now theyre eatin rats.
I imagine if they raise the eligibility here for SS to 70 years old people would be upset. Maybe not rioting upset but they would rightfully be upset.
Can you give an example of a first world country where this has happened?