Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2023 0:54:52 GMT -8
From the liberal dictionary: hate /hāt/ Learn to pronounce verb Anything I disagree with Looks like someone is bored. Can't you go cash your liberal social security check or something?  |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Feb 25, 2023 11:05:16 GMT -8
Looks like someone is bored. Can't you go cash your liberal social security check or something? From the liberal dictionary: Learn to pronounce noun when another lib responds to a conservative |
|
|
|
Post by jcjames on Feb 25, 2023 21:41:59 GMT -8
Nvm.  |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Feb 26, 2023 13:43:03 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by kav on Feb 26, 2023 13:57:12 GMT -8
Lord of Rings goin woke like pretty much everything coming out of Hollywood. Libs destroy everything they touch.  |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Feb 26, 2023 13:57:43 GMT -8
Cue the "Stop the hate" cries from libbies-
|
|
|
|
Post by kav on Feb 26, 2023 17:34:26 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by theCapraAegagrus on Feb 27, 2023 5:27:16 GMT -8
It's ironic because you're biased to believing that only 1 political party embraces hate and intolerance.
Explain to me how I'm doing that? I'm not saying the left is perfect, there is a lot I don't agree with the corporate democrats in congress...just as I don't believe all republicans embrace hate and intolerance.
You said, "the", which is exclusionary.
|
|
|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Feb 27, 2023 6:50:55 GMT -8
Explain to me how I'm doing that? I'm not saying the left is perfect, there is a lot I don't agree with the corporate democrats in congress...just as I don't believe all republicans embrace hate and intolerance.
You said, "the", which is exclusionary.
I'd rather have a sincere debate over the issue as opposed to a semantic argument. YMMV |
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Feb 27, 2023 7:25:08 GMT -8
Then don't debate. Discuss, WITH FCATS (savvy?).
It is clearly established that you have a Google/Wiki PHD, and an MS in Illogical Logic, with a Concentration in Debate Phrasing (Whataboutism/Whereasism/Assumptionism/OHYEAIDEOLOGYDIVISION/Suposeism/Itsnotmeitsyouism).
|
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Feb 27, 2023 7:29:12 GMT -8
ZODISM is a particularly interesting phenomenon to observe.
|
|
|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Feb 27, 2023 7:47:57 GMT -8
Then don't debate. Discuss, WITH FCATS (savvy?). It is clearly established that you have a Google/Wiki PHD, and an MS in Illogical Logic, with a Concentration in Debate Phrasing (Whataboutism/Whereasism/Assumptionism/OHYEAIDEOLOGYDIVISION/Suposeism/Itsnotmeitsyouism). Then ignore me as I attempt to have sincere discussions. I rarely respond to you and not because I don't like you, it's because you're a bad actor who brings nothing to the conversation and that's not hyperbole, you really bring nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by theCapraAegagrus on Feb 27, 2023 8:38:52 GMT -8
You said, "the", which is exclusionary.
I'd rather have a sincere debate over the issue as opposed to a semantic argument. YMMV
I answered the question. If "the issue" is you understanding the irony, that answer resolves it, right?
Edit: To clarify, you said, "the party". Had you said, "a party", I would not have commented at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by jcjames on Feb 27, 2023 8:52:29 GMT -8
I answered the question. If "the issue" is you understanding the irony, that answer resolves it, right?
Edit: To clarify, you said, "the party". Had you said, "a party", I would not have commented at all.
Apparently when some folks here say they want to have a "sincere" debate or conversation, it's clear they're being disingenuous (to put it politely). The evidence of this disingenuousness is in their repeatedly ignoring sincere questions from someone regarding defending innocent life, to be met with their immediately changing the subject towards banning inanimate objects an other such nonsense. Repeatedly ignoring sincere questions of the topic is not the sign of wanting sincere discussion, it's just plain BS. One can only ask a rock about defending human life so many times, only to be met with zero replies to those sincere questions, and instead is met with the rock trying to trip oneself, before one simply just steps over the rock and continues on one's path.  ETA: Directing the response to the proper recipient. |
|
|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Feb 27, 2023 9:01:18 GMT -8
I answered the question. If "the issue" is you understanding the irony, that answer resolves it, right?
Edit: To clarify, you said, "the party". Had you said, "a party", I would not have commented at all.
Apparently when some folks here say they want to have a "sincere" debate or conversation, it's clear they're being disingenuous (to put it politely). The evidence of this disingenuousness is in their repeatedly ignoring sincere questions from someone regarding defending innocent life, to be met with their immediately changing the subject towards banning inanimate objects an other such nonsense. Repeatedly ignoring sincere questions of the topic is not the sign of wanting sincere discussion, it's just plain BS. One can only ask a rock about defending human life so many times, only to be met with zero replies to those sincere questions, and instead is met with the rock trying to trip oneself, before one simply just steps over the rock and continues on one's path. ETA: Directing the response to the proper recipient. I don't know how many times I can repeat this. I do not believe abortion is murder, you do, what else can be said? Please don't impose your religious beliefs on others. In the US...as much as some people would love it, we are not a christian nationalist country. I'm not forcing you to get an abortion, how about stop trying to take away my right to have one. |
|
