Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2023 17:08:18 GMT -8
Two young boys walked into a pharmacy one day, picked out a box of tampons, and proceeded to the checkout counter. The pharmacist at the counter asked the older boy, 'Son, how old are you?' 'Eight', the boy replied. The man continued, 'Do you know what these are used for?' The boy replied, 'Not exactly, but they aren't for me. They're for him. He's my brother. He's four." "Oh, really?" the pharmacist replied with a grin. "Yes." the boy said. "We saw on TV that if you use these, you would be able to swim, play tennis and ride a bike. Right now, he can't do none of those." Real kids can use real help from St. Jude, Kav. Can I put you down for a promise to donate $50 to them as explained above?  LMK, and what about that Canadian teacher? I fear that GWN circus has been lost in Prater's academic arson shuffle.  |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Jan 23, 2023 17:11:00 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jan 23, 2023 18:12:15 GMT -8
I always put my money where my mouth is. And you sir, have broken logic. As was jcjames, I'm done spinning my wheels on this train of discussion. Until you PROVE that Prater has a history of malfeasance it's just an empty accusation. That's your own wheels spinning on the slick surface of your surreal incompetence, Vin. But good to hear you're ready to help the kids of St. Jude! Due to her history of trolling/academic arson, Prater won't be rehired by Hamline, nor will she prevail in any legal case she might bring against them for her non-renewed contract. How certain is Zod of this? In addition to my regular giving to them, I'm prepared to donate up to $500.00 to St Jude if I'm wrong. Yup. Still no proof that Prater has a history of malfeasance but instead, you just moved the goal posts into the next sport by changing the discussion to whether she'll get rehired or not which nobody was really discussing. As someone I know once used to say: "You're a riot, Alice!" |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2023 16:40:36 GMT -8
That's your own wheels spinning on the slick surface of your surreal incompetence, Vin. But good to hear you're ready to help the kids of St. Jude! Due to her history of trolling/academic arson, Prater won't be rehired by Hamline, nor will she prevail in any legal case she might bring against them for her non-renewed contract. How certain is Zod of this? In addition to my regular giving to them, I'm prepared to donate up to $500.00 to St Jude if I'm wrong. [Remainder of original post follows]Are ANY others here willing to do the same?
Anyone who wishes to do so can promise to donate anywhere from $50 apiece up to the full $500 if Zod is correct. (That means up to 10 people can participate at the $50 level.)
And to make it ridiculously fair/easy, while I won't ask for proof of donation from any of you when I'm proven right, in the incredibly unlikely event that Zod is wrong, I'll submit proof of donation to Woogieman - someone we all know, trust and like - and he can announce this on the forum.
The time span in which Prater has to act (or Hamline rehire her) runs until the end of 2023, but Zod's offer will be open for one week from today - until 8pm EST January 30, 2023.
How many of you will put your money on the line to help sick children?
Please note that it's most likely Prater will slink away into anonymity, and won't bring any legal action against Hamline for her contract non-renewal, and if this turns out to be the case (and assuming Hamline doesn't rehire her), no action will be required on anyone's part.
I'll now await the avalanche of replies from those eager to do the right thing while backing up their assertions...
 Yup. Still no proof that Prater has a history of malfeasance but instead, you just moved the goal posts into the next sport by changing the discussion to whether she'll get rehired or not which nobody was really discussing. As someone I know once used to say: "You're a riot, Alice!" Despite your promising otherwise, your money and mouth are running in different directions - imagine Zod's shock.  This is the case with all others as well. Doubly shocking.  And in addition to this, your standard selective (and of course incorrect) response to the question of her possible rehiring, extensively discussed here. Zod notes that whatever belief system humans claim to follow, their true religions are incompetence and hypocrisy. But Zod's offer stands until this coming Monday.  |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jan 24, 2023 16:47:38 GMT -8
Still not a single shred of proof of Prater having a history of malfeasance to support your point. Shocker.  Your logic is broken exactly just like another board member I used to debate with. Shocker. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2023 17:32:19 GMT -8
Still not a single shred of proof of Prater having a history of malfeasance to support your point. Shocker. Your logic is broken exactly just like another board member I used to debate with. Shocker. Prater was not renewed due to her history, but I see your mouth and money are now even farther apart. Shocker. You appear to be both projecting and conjuring. Shocker. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jan 24, 2023 17:38:41 GMT -8
Still not a single shred of proof of Prater having a history of malfeasance to support your point. Shocker. Your logic is broken exactly just like another board member I used to debate with. Shocker. Prater was not renewed due to her history, but I see your mouth and money are now even farther apart. But where is the PROOF of what her history is? I've searched for it and couldn't find it online. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2023 17:49:28 GMT -8
As Zod breathlessly awaits the rush to accept his offer to see St. Jude assisted in their work, the case of UCLA's Gordon Klein is an interesting one to consider. UCLA's response to his lawsuit below. newsroom.ucla.edu/statement-in-response-to-gordon-klein-lawsuitPart of their reply as follows (underlining mine): Because this is pending litigation involving allegations that implicate personnel privacy, we can’t address Mr. Klein’s specific assertions without his express written permission. And we understand that unanswered questions can sometimes seem like answers themselves, unfortunately. But sometimes we must wait to share the facts in the proper forum, a court of law, and bear the possibility of being misunderstood in the court of public opinion. A deliberative process is what personnel issues deserve. We hope Bruins understand our current position and await the moment when we can share our side of the story.The only thing that would shock Zod more than Hamline's Prater pursuing legal action pertaining to her non-renewal would be her prevailing in such action. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jan 24, 2023 17:57:46 GMT -8
As Zod breathlessly awaits the rush to accept his offer to see St. Jude assisted in their work, the case of UCLA's Gordon Klein is an interesting one to consider. So you say your name is Zod, you want to make a real bet on something nobody was debating and you use a completely different, unrelated case to support your point?   |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Jan 24, 2023 18:17:28 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by kav on Jan 24, 2023 18:18:09 GMT -8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2023 23:40:01 GMT -8
Prater was not renewed due to her history, but I see your mouth and money are now even farther apart. But where is the PROOF of what her history is? I've searched for it and couldn't find it online. Vin's mouth:  Vin's money:  If Prater is foolish enough to sue, evidence aplenty will emerge, hence Zod's certainty that she will slink away. (See the UCLA statement I posted for more info. on now these things are handled.) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2023 23:43:33 GMT -8
As Zod breathlessly awaits the rush to accept his offer to see St. Jude assisted in their work, the case of UCLA's Gordon Klein is an interesting one to consider. So you say your name is Zod, you want to make a real bet on something nobody was debating and you use a completely different, unrelated case to support your point? So you say your name is Zod Correct.you want to make a real bet on something nobody was debating Incorrect.and you use a completely different, unrelated case to support your point? Incorrect. Indeed. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2023 23:47:34 GMT -8
This thread has taken an unexpected turn for the adorable.  Kav is excused without penalty from participation in supporting St. Jude as Zod has proposed. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Jan 25, 2023 12:32:41 GMT -8
|
|
