E.S.G. ties all the world's conspiracies together

The phrase 'follow the money' is most apt in this discussion. 


Billionaires don't like bad investments and nothing is more favorable to an investor than STABILITY.

And the reason authoritarian rule and dictatorships are so favorable is the amount of CONTROL and STABILITY this form of rule gives to companies invested in these countries. 

Here is the CEO of Blackrock, Larry Fink talking about it.


"Markets don't like uncertainty.

Markets like totalitarian governments where you have an understanding obviously, of what's out there the whole dimension is changing now as you said a democratization of countries.

And democracies are very messy, as we know in the United States.

We have opinions changing back and forth."

I know a lot of people think I'm pulling this stuff out of my azz, so here's a few more credible articles to tie together for you. 

Let's keep it comic book related. 




Blackrock, who owns a little of everything from CGC to 7.3% of Pfizer (4070 Million shares to  be exact) is the largest money manager in the world. Larry Fink, who was quoted above is the CEO.

From what I've gathered, they hold about $10 TRILLION in assets (yes, Trillion, not Billion).



This post is merely meant to show that the largest investment corporations in the world are using ESG as their investment strategy.


BlackRock CEO Stands Firm on ESG Investing

And there you have it folks. All with a bow on it, even.

So economics and investment are now tied directly to sustainability, the largest corporations in the world are all heavily vested in sustainability through ESG and therefore all of the largest corporations in the world have a vested interest in stable population control and a more controlling government. 

And THIS is exactly why things are headed in the direction they are.

Follow the money, and there has never been more money to follow than there is right now. 

This is a Vox article.


For those who care, and the clowns who like to target me as 'pushing a right wing agenda', The Vox is typically a 'left leaning' publication. 

This article is based on a study published by Cambridge University.

Wait, Cambridge is a good school isn't it?  

So how does this study and this article relate to Trump you might ask? It doesn't. They were published in 2014, almost a decade ago.   


The article: 

Study: Politicians listen to rich people, not you


The Cambridge study publicaiton:

Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens



Why is this important?


The conclusion of the study (these are excerpts):

American Democracy?

What do our findings say about democracy in America? They certainly constitute troubling news for advocates of “populistic” democracy, who want governments to respond primarily or exclusively to the policy preferences of their citizens. In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule—at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes. When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.

---------------------------------

Our findings also point toward the need to learn more about exactly which economic elites (the “merely affluent”? the top 1 percent? the top one-tenth of 1 percent?) have how much impact upon public policy, and to what ends they wield their influence. Similar questions arise about the precise extent of influence of particular sets of organized interest groups. And we need to know more about the policy preferences and the political influence of various actors not considered here, including political party activists, government officials, and other non-economic elites. We hope that our work will encourage further exploration of these issues.



Despite the seemingly strong empirical support in previous studies for theories of majoritarian democracy, our analyses suggest that majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts. Americans do enjoy many features central to democratic governance, such as regular elections, freedom of speech and association, and a widespread (if still contested) franchise. But we believe that if policymaking is dominated by powerful business organizations and a small number of affluent Americans, then America’s claims to being a democratic society are seriously threatened.

But wait, there's more! 

If you don't believe me you can spend some time watching this Documentary by Naom Chomsky. A far left, Liberal Socialist. 

So much for the people's clown's accusations of me pushing 'far right' agendas. 

This great documentary goes into great detail, including the US Constitution, in detailing the class warfare going on and how democracy is just an illusion. 

The documentary is available for free online.