E.S.G. ties all the world's conspiracies together

Right, because the ones who aren't conspiracy theorists are the ones who aren't bright. That works.

Yes, you are a conspiracy theorist because you have shown no actual data. When you do show something it's always suspect, but that's part of the delusion. Kav showed you how your "evidence" was stated by someone currently under investigation and you claimed that's all part of the "silencing" ( conspiracy ).

He explained to you very clearly how vaccines work and you STILL denied it.

The reason no one bothers to debate you is because it doesn't MATTER, they have no hope of penetrating your bubble.

You're one to get all uppity, you accused me of being one of the most despised people in the comic book community and I'm the one calling names.

How a vaccine works in theory and how they affect the general population are two different things. 

Drugs always work well in theory and not so well in the general population. 

That's why every drug has side effects, and the number of side effects grow as their usage grows. 

It's simple logic. 

This is why Americans have such great drug commercials listing all the possible side effects. 

I have a question for you:

Do you think the Covid-19 vaccines should have their side effects listed in every commercial the way all other drugs must have them?

----------------------------------------------

Kav posted a link to an article smearing Peter McCullough, one of the most renowned and published heart doctors in the world but even the article he linked listed no specific information of what Peter McCullough was guilty of, it was just a general smear. The articles greatest accusation against McCullough was that he was using Baylor's name in his public statements while they objected to it. 

Meanwhile, that same article that SHOULD have discredited McCullough discredited other doctors with much greater detail. 

That's how conspiracy theorists work. A little IRRELEVANT truth and a lot of smear. 

You have to stop "paraphrasing" what people say and you need to start quoting them directly to have a proper conversation.

So far all you've been is wrong.


All I've done is post data. 

You're the one who hasn't shown any actual data.

If you have, can you point to one post of yours that has showed some accurate data and not name calling, smears, etc?

I don't play to win. I play to make progress.

Comes anonymously using an alias, sounds exactly like someone else who dislikes me, calls me names, hasn't posted a single original point, leaves when asked for evidence. 

So let it be written, so let it be done.

What's ironic is that you endlessly accused "warmers" of buying into a public narrative against facts and railed against CGCMike in the "Warming" thread in the WC for not allowing you to discuss things openly to refute their narrative.

Now you have the opportunity and you turn it down. 

Why?

Because it's impossible to refute the many credible studies I have offered. Simply calling them all "noise" without having the discussion is what you did, just like the Warmers did in the WC.

Then you threw links at me that were very unhelpful to anyone who took the time to read them. 

Meanwhile, these studies I provided were and still are responsible for real life action by governments and movements around the world.  

And those movements are discrediting the public narrative in real time, right now. 


Then you went on to argue over a comment I made about your spelling. 

The last straw? You bailed out after I offered to post our PM exchange from a year ago where you accused me of saying "nasty things" (which I didn't) but you actually did say nasty things.

Twist is any way you want, but don't paint it like I'm the unreasonable one. 

I must not be, because that didn't make any sense to me.

Let me guess, you're the type that tells the jokes at parties no one laughs at?