|
|
Buzzetta
Aug 7, 2021 12:39:29 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by hollywood1892 on Aug 7, 2021 12:39:29 GMT -8
*adversity *effective I'll use it in a sentence so you understand the difference...IDGAF that I created BaronSamedi so I could garner information from my adversary TwoBitch so I could use it at a later date, BaronSamedi was an effective tool/agent in the face of adversity against people you claim don't want anything to do with me, yet attempt to affect the better angels of my nature with their passive aggressive comments, yet contemeperaneously claim they want nothing to do with me, seems a bit of a contradiction in terms...."I want nothing to do with you, but in reality I'll make insulting comments towards you, button hump your posts, check out your profile and cry wolf everytime you post" I was never your adversary Buzzetta. Yes you are obnoxious and self absorbed, but I made every effort to be cordial with you, even after you told me to stop posting on your threads. It was your choice to be oftput by a shill account designed solely for Twobitch (a guy you claim you don't even like and would punch in the face given a chance) that you never would have expected was me and never would have found out unless that rat  Kav told you....remember it is your choice...you respond to me (even passive aggressively) and I will respond to you...unless your posts are a figment of my imagination, as you claim I'm delusional and have a skewed version of reality I certainty don't want to dismiss the thrust of your post, or minimize the impact, but: Fairness dictates I comment, because Buzzetta was simply correcting the spelling of his post rely to steveinthecity. In fact, it compels me to match the correction: Caucasian, not "Causation", in my reply to steveinthecity. Now, your turn: oftput, contemeperaneously, everytime. What? I guess oftput was simply short forming off putting contemperaneously simply means at the same time not necessarily everytime...but I guess your saying I should put a space in between every and time...autocorrect really should have caught that... |
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,318
|
Post by parker1865 on Aug 7, 2021 12:55:14 GMT -8
Oh well. I tried.
Blessings to all.
|
|
|
|
Buzzetta
Aug 7, 2021 13:16:00 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by hollywood1892 on Aug 7, 2021 13:16:00 GMT -8
Oh well. I tried. Blessings to all. You tried what? You corrected me, I admitted my grammatical mistakes....would you like me to acquiesce my entire identity to satisfy you? Stop speaking in vague abstracts and get to the point |
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,318
|
Post by parker1865 on Aug 7, 2021 14:08:27 GMT -8
Yikes.......
|
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on Aug 7, 2021 14:44:56 GMT -8
Lt. Dan never married in the book. That movie is an abomination the way it twisted and retold the truths of Forrest’s and others lives. Re-telling history for the sake of box office profits. Shameful.  I have read the book as well and I prefer the movie. In this case given the portrayal of Gump and the Hanks in general, I preferred the hopeful uplifting portrayal of the character over the cynical way the character was written. I think it is because of that hopefulness that the movie has stood so well over the years. Have you seen Manchester by the Sea? It is a great movie. It is very powerful in its own right especially with the "I can't beat it, I'm sorry." line at the end, but it is not something that I will keep on for long if I come across it on TV. Gump is something that stands the test of time because of simple hope in the face of adversary and how it can be affective in helping others. I think it was a movie that deserves a view from time to time that things can be better. Have not seen it, but saw it’s available on Prime so I’ll give it a go in a day or two. I like the FG movie, too. I was just having fun with the old “book was better than the movie” trope. Lt. Dan never married in the book. That movie is an abomination the way it twisted and retold the truths of Forrest’s and others lives. Re-telling history for the sake of box office profits. Shameful. Meh. Get back to me when your azz runs through a jungle saving others. BTW, got somethin against interracial marriages, specifically Causation and Asian? Or, maybe you just missed the point and symbolism and theme of the movie, that Zemeckis was embracing and missed the point of the damage that those that served experienced, and the hope of love and survival regardless of circumstances. Maybe you did not know that Groom served with the 4th in VN, during particularly cynical years....and they were, I can assure you... and was very bitter. He wrote it in 86, at a time when we were just socially becoming aware of the horror that was the VN Vets that survived, and the incredible overwhelming problems the U.S. had to deal with, because of it. Any questions? Or, maybe your empathy meter was broken and twisted and needs to be retold how to process. Abomination? Truths? Really? Nothin but love, Brother. It don't mean nothin'. Nah, never been in a jungle in a crisis scenario and would prefer to live out my days without having such an experience. I’ve nothing against interracial marriages whatsoever. I’m of a mind that if any two people can form a bond, whether formally by State or Church or informally by any means, I’m good with it. I think it’s wonderful when two people share their lives together. I’m a bit on the conservative side, so Polygamy/Polyandry strike me as unusual, but whatever works for someone I’m fine with it. Did not know any background of the author or specifically that he was a veteran. I picked up the book because I wanted something to read, and this was on a spinner rack in Walgreens in ‘87 with a cover blurb from Larry King, and at the time if Larry said something was good, I was down. I’ve never had a “bucket list”, but if I did back then, Duke Ziebert’s would’ve been on it. Otherwise, as I said above, I was just “funnin” with an old trope. There’s no actual “abomination”, and really no “truths” for that matter. The movie is a retelling of a work of fiction, so I get to complain because the movie veered away in some instances from the book and I was a book fan first. |
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,318
|
Post by parker1865 on Aug 7, 2021 15:27:09 GMT -8
I have read the book as well and I prefer the movie. In this case given the portrayal of Gump and the Hanks in general, I preferred the hopeful uplifting portrayal of the character over the cynical way the character was written. I think it is because of that hopefulness that the movie has stood so well over the years. Have you seen Manchester by the Sea? It is a great movie. It is very powerful in its own right especially with the "I can't beat it, I'm sorry." line at the end, but it is not something that I will keep on for long if I come across it on TV. Gump is something that stands the test of time because of simple hope in the face of adversary and how it can be affective in helping others. I think it was a movie that deserves a view from time to time that things can be better. Have not seen it, but saw it’s available on Prime so I’ll give it a go in a day or two. I like the FG movie, too. I was just having fun with the old “book was better than the movie” trope. Meh. Get back to me when your azz runs through a jungle saving others. BTW, got somethin against interracial marriages, specifically Causation and Asian? Or, maybe you just missed the point and symbolism and theme of the movie, that Zemeckis was embracing and missed the point of the damage that those that served experienced, and the hope of love and survival regardless of circumstances. Maybe you did not know that Groom served with the 4th in VN, during particularly cynical years....and they were, I can assure you... and was very bitter. He wrote it in 86, at a time when we were just socially becoming aware of the horror that was the VN Vets that survived, and the incredible overwhelming problems the U.S. had to deal with, because of it. Any questions? Or, maybe your empathy meter was broken and twisted and needs to be retold how to process. Abomination? Truths? Really? Nothin but love, Brother. It don't mean nothin'. Nah, never been in a jungle in a crisis scenario and would prefer to live out my days without having such an experience. I’ve nothing against interracial marriages whatsoever. I’m of a mind that if any two people can form a bond, whether formally by State or Church or informally by any means, I’m good with it. I think it’s wonderful when two people share their lives together. I’m a bit on the conservative side, so Polygamy/Polyandry strike me as unusual, but whatever works for someone I’m fine with it. Did not know any background of the author or specifically that he was a veteran. I picked up the book because I wanted something to read, and this was on a spinner rack in Walgreens in ‘87 with a cover blurb from Larry King, and at the time if Larry said something was good, I was down. I’ve never had a “bucket list”, but if I did back then, Duke Ziebert’s would’ve been on it. Otherwise, as I said above, I was just “funnin” with an old trope. There’s no actual “abomination”, and really no “truths” for that matter. The movie is a retelling of a work of fiction, so I get to complain because the movie veered away in some instances from the book and I was a book fan first. Understood. I don't know how the polygamy/polyandry stuff became interwoven in the subject(s) ...sort of weird...but, other than that, got it. Don't know how Duke Zeiberts snuck into the exchange either, however since it did get under the covers, I had been to Dukes many times. Lived not far away in my late teens. You may be interested to know that in the late 60s, early 70s, Vets were welcome. It was a welcoming home feeling sort of place anyway, but the atmosphere was non-snobbish. That was back when you could actually walk the streets in NW, any time of the day or night. Plus, beer at 18 in D.C., then. Win Win. |
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on Aug 7, 2021 21:42:46 GMT -8
Have not seen it, but saw it’s available on Prime so I’ll give it a go in a day or two. I like the FG movie, too. I was just having fun with the old “book was better than the movie” trope. Nah, never been in a jungle in a crisis scenario and would prefer to live out my days without having such an experience. I’ve nothing against interracial marriages whatsoever. I’m of a mind that if any two people can form a bond, whether formally by State or Church or informally by any means, I’m good with it. I think it’s wonderful when two people share their lives together. I’m a bit on the conservative side, so Polygamy/Polyandry strike me as unusual, but whatever works for someone I’m fine with it. Did not know any background of the author or specifically that he was a veteran. I picked up the book because I wanted something to read, and this was on a spinner rack in Walgreens in ‘87 with a cover blurb from Larry King, and at the time if Larry said something was good, I was down. I’ve never had a “bucket list”, but if I did back then, Duke Ziebert’s would’ve been on it. Otherwise, as I said above, I was just “funnin” with an old trope. There’s no actual “abomination”, and really no “truths” for that matter. The movie is a retelling of a work of fiction, so I get to complain because the movie veered away in some instances from the book and I was a book fan first. Understood. I don't know how the polygamy/polyandry stuff became interwoven in the subject(s) ...sort of weird...but, other than that, got it. Don't know how Duke Zeiberts snuck into the exchange either, however since it did get under the covers, I had been to Dukes many times. Lived not far away in my late teens. You may be interested to know that in the late 60s, early 70s, Vets were welcome. It was a welcoming home feeling sort of place anyway, but the atmosphere was non-snobbish. That was back when you could actually walk the streets in NW, any time of the day or night. Plus, beer at 18 in D.C., then. Win Win. The polygamy stuff was relevant to me in that it fell under the marriage umbrella and I believe I’m pretty open or “flexible” on the “marriage” thing. Duke’s was mentioned because the place(or person) was mentioned every weeknight on Larry’s radio show back when. Cool that you’ve been there and had a good word to say. It’s a place that I’ve seemingly known about forever but never visited first hand. I don’t know much about the acceptance of veterans in the 60’s & 70’s except what I got from tv & books which never painted a rosy picture. As a kid, I thought it sucked and I didn’t know why. As an adult, I still don’t understand the negative feeling shown towards service members from that era. I never enjoyed the benefit of a legal drinking age being 18. I’m surely guilty of countless misdemeanors as a result. I’ve only spent time in DC as a daytime tourist, no beer. 🍺🍻🍺🍻 |
|
Buzzetta
TCBF Member
Joined: January 2017
Posts: 395 
|
Post by Buzzetta on Aug 8, 2021 6:01:41 GMT -8
I have read the book as well and I prefer the movie. In this case given the portrayal of Gump and the Hanks in general, I preferred the hopeful uplifting portrayal of the character over the cynical way the character was written. I think it is because of that hopefulness that the movie has stood so well over the years. Have you seen Manchester by the Sea? It is a great movie. It is very powerful in its own right especially with the "I can't beat it, I'm sorry." line at the end, but it is not something that I will keep on for long if I come across it on TV. Gump is something that stands the test of time because of simple hope in the face of adversary and how it can be affective in helping others. I think it was a movie that deserves a view from time to time that things can be better. *adversity *effective I'll use it in a sentence so you understand the difference...IDGAF that I created BaronSamedi so I could garner information from my adversary TwoBitch so I could use it at a later date, BaronSamedi was an effective tool/agent in the face of adversity against people you claim don't want anything to do with me, yet attempt to affect the better angels of my nature with their passive aggressive comments, yet contemperaneously claim they want nothing to do with me, seems a bit of a contradiction in terms...."I want nothing to do with you, but in reality I'll make insulting comments towards you, button hump your posts, check out your profile and cry wolf everytime you post" I was never your adversary Buzzetta. Yes you are obnoxious and self absorbed, but I made every effort to be cordial with you, even after you told me to stop posting on your threads. It was your choice to be oftput by a shill account designed solely for Twobitch (a guy you claim you don't even like and would punch in the face given a chance) that you never would have expected was me and never would have found out unless that rat Kav told you....remember it is your choice...you respond to me (even passive aggressively) and I will respond to you...unless your posts are a figment of my imagination, as you claim I'm delusional and have a skewed version of reality Now I suspect that there are drugs involved. Like I said, you are flat out creepy. We were talking about Forrest Gump. |
|
Buzzetta
TCBF Member
Joined: January 2017
Posts: 395
|
Post by Buzzetta on Aug 8, 2021 6:11:38 GMT -8
I have read the book as well and I prefer the movie. In this case given the portrayal of Gump and the Hanks in general, I preferred the hopeful uplifting portrayal of the character over the cynical way the character was written. I think it is because of that hopefulness that the movie has stood so well over the years. Have you seen Manchester by the Sea? It is a great movie. It is very powerful in its own right especially with the "I can't beat it, I'm sorry." line at the end, but it is not something that I will keep on for long if I come across it on TV. Gump is something that stands the test of time because of simple hope in the face of adversary and how it can be affective in helping others. I think it was a movie that deserves a view from time to time that things can be better. Have not seen it, but saw it’s available on Prime so I’ll give it a go in a day or two. I like the FG movie, too. I was just having fun with the old “book was better than the movie” trope. Ha... there are quite a few movies that I believe are better than the books. Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings movies are far superior to the original works. I base this primarily on the things within the books that disrupt the narrative. I remember reading them and being immersed in the Tolkien world only for the narrative to switch to the characters singing a song followed by lyrics. I have never been a fan of something like that within writing because unless it is a familiar song, the mind starts to try to 'invent' music to the lyrics in front of you. When that happened it immediately disrupted the narrative for me and took me out of the experience. Tolkien really wrote the summer blockbuster before film could produce something like that which is another reason I think that it a better experience than the books. Don't get me wrong either. The books are phenomenal and just deserve the accolades they have garnered. |
|
Buzzetta
TCBF Member
Joined: January 2017
Posts: 395
|
Post by Buzzetta on Aug 8, 2021 6:13:30 GMT -8
Another movie that is better than the book?
Die Hard is better than "Nothing Lasts Forever"
|
|
Buzzetta
TCBF Member
Joined: January 2017
Posts: 395
|
Post by Buzzetta on Aug 8, 2021 7:27:50 GMT -8
You might be the greatest in the world....a straight coward who thinks he is tough....you are a dude....you run your mouth on a goofy website you straight up then you go running to the mods!"oh please Hollywood insulted me" move You might fool the guys around these parts...talking like I got mommy and daddy issues like it affects me, your a straight up ! ... collosal I three women today, but I'm delusional.... Am I wrecking myself ya ? Sold my comic collection for 50k am I imagining that ya ? I am quoting this for posterity. Ignoring you does not seem to work. So... Seriously, get some help. Rehab? Counseling? It is not normal, nor indicative of sound mind and body to keep being fixated on people who want nothing to do with someone. You? You go on and on and on and on... You reference it. You reference them. You poke to elicit responses. It seems to keep you up at night. Then when you get the response that you have coming to you, you go off the deep end. I find you creepy. How many other ways do I have to say it? I have asked you to stop referencing me, alluding to me, trying to stir the pot and forget about me. For some reason you are infatuated. I tried ignoring you and that does not seem to work. So my new way to try to get you to stop is to point out 'certain things'. How you can passively aggressively complain about people creating shill accounts, (which for the record I have never done) after you repeatedly admit to doing so in order to CREEP on people is disturbing in multiple ways. As I have said before, I cannot fathom making up a new identity in order to 'get to know' someone that has already said they do not want to have anything to do with me. That is some psychotic, serial killer, lock a girl in a basement, toss her down a well, and tell her to put lotion on her skin level craziness. Seek help. |
|
|
|
Buzzetta
Aug 8, 2021 11:23:37 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by hollywood1892 on Aug 8, 2021 11:23:37 GMT -8
You might be the greatest in the world....a straight coward who thinks he is tough....you are a dude....you run your mouth on a goofy website you straight up then you go running to the mods!"oh please Hollywood insulted me" move You might fool the guys around these parts...talking like I got mommy and daddy issues like it affects me, your a straight up ! ... collosal I three women today, but I'm delusional.... Am I wrecking myself ya ? Sold my comic collection for 50k am I imagining that ya ? I am quoting this for posterity. Ignoring you does not seem to work. So... Seriously, get some help. Rehab? Counseling? It is not normal, nor indicative of sound mind and body to keep being fixated on people who want nothing to do with someone. You? You go on and on and on and on... You reference it. You reference them. You poke to elicit responses. It seems to keep you up at night. Then when you get the response that you have coming to you, you go off the deep end. I find you creepy. How many other ways do I have to say it? I have asked you to stop referencing me, alluding to me, trying to stir the pot and forget about me. For some reason you are infatuated. I tried ignoring you and that does not seem to work. So my new way to try to get you to stop is to point out 'certain things'. How you can passively aggressively complain about people creating shill accounts, (which for the record I have never done) after you repeatedly admit to doing so in order to CREEP on people is disturbing in multiple ways. As I have said before, I cannot fathom making up a new identity in order to 'get to know' someone that has already said they do not want to have anything to do with me. That is some psychotic, serial killer, lock a girl in a basement, toss her down a well, and tell her to put lotion on her skin level craziness. Seek help. Shut the  up You didn't have to respond to that thread....if I have something coming to me then bring it...I'm not trying to get to "know" twobitch you stupid ...Stop talking like there is something wrong with me like it's gonna trigger me...you are a straight up loon....I've thought you were a loon a long time ago, that hasn't changed....I created a shill account, get over it, it wasn't created for the reasons you are mentioning ....you viewed my profile 3 weeks ago, stop saying I'm a non entity if your checking out my profile loon, it's like your in love with me or something and it's actually making me uncomfortable, just like how you made that girl uncomfortable by putting cameras up around your house, like you think your important or something...go yourself you weirdo, and referencing silence of the lambs, your a dude I would never think of doing dumb shot like that...sorry are you a psychologist? Naw you are a wannabe who runs his mouth on the internet You ratted me out on that post and I got 5 points...you beg Dena to ban me permanently...how would you even know about a shill account if Kav didn't tell you...so what does it matter... your such a straight loon |
|
|
|
Buzzetta
Aug 8, 2021 11:27:50 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by hollywood1892 on Aug 8, 2021 11:27:50 GMT -8
*adversity *effective I'll use it in a sentence so you understand the difference...IDGAF that I created BaronSamedi so I could garner information from my adversary TwoBitch so I could use it at a later date, BaronSamedi was an effective tool/agent in the face of adversity against people you claim don't want anything to do with me, yet attempt to affect the better angels of my nature with their passive aggressive comments, yet contemperaneously claim they want nothing to do with me, seems a bit of a contradiction in terms...."I want nothing to do with you, but in reality I'll make insulting comments towards you, button hump your posts, check out your profile and cry wolf everytime you post" I was never your adversary Buzzetta. Yes you are obnoxious and self absorbed, but I made every effort to be cordial with you, even after you told me to stop posting on your threads. It was your choice to be oftput by a shill account designed solely for Twobitch (a guy you claim you don't even like and would punch in the face given a chance) that you never would have expected was me and never would have found out unless that rat Kav told you....remember it is your choice...you respond to me (even passive aggressively) and I will respond to you...unless your posts are a figment of my imagination, as you claim I'm delusional and have a skewed version of reality Now I suspect that there are drugs involved. Like I said, you are flat out creepy. We were talking about Forrest Gump. Yeah and you used adversary when it should have been adversity and affective when it should have been effective |
|
|
|
Buzzetta
Aug 8, 2021 11:36:25 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by hollywood1892 on Aug 8, 2021 11:36:25 GMT -8
I am quoting this for posterity. Ignoring you does not seem to work. So... Seriously, get some help. Rehab? Counseling? It is not normal, nor indicative of sound mind and body to keep being fixated on people who want nothing to do with someone. You? You go on and on and on and on... You reference it. You reference them. You poke to elicit responses. It seems to keep you up at night. Then when you get the response that you have coming to you, you go off the deep end. I find you creepy. How many other ways do I have to say it? I have asked you to stop referencing me, alluding to me, trying to stir the pot and forget about me. For some reason you are infatuated. I tried ignoring you and that does not seem to work. So my new way to try to get you to stop is to point out 'certain things'. How you can passively aggressively complain about people creating shill accounts, (which for the record I have never done) after you repeatedly admit to doing so in order to CREEP on people is disturbing in multiple ways. As I have said before, I cannot fathom making up a new identity in order to 'get to know' someone that has already said they do not want to have anything to do with me. That is some psychotic, serial killer, lock a girl in a basement, toss her down a well, and tell her to put lotion on her skin level craziness. Seek help. Shut the up You didn't have to respond to that thread....if I have something coming to me then bring it...I'm not trying to get to "know" twobitch you stupid ...Stop talking like there is something wrong with me like it's gonna trigger me...you are a straight up loon....I've thought you were a loon a long time ago, that hasn't changed....I created a shill account, get over it, it wasn't created for the reasons you are mentioning ....you viewed my profile 3 weeks ago, stop saying I'm a non entity if your checking out my profile loon, it's like your in love with me or something and it's actually making me uncomfortable, just like how you made that girl uncomfortable by putting cameras up around your house, like you think your important or something...go yourself you weirdo, and referencing silence of the lambs, your a dude I would never think of doing dumb shot like that...sorry are you a psychologist? Naw you are a wannabe who runs his mouth on the internet You ratted me out on that post and I got 5 points...you beg Dena to ban me permanently...how would you even know about a shill account if Kav didn't tell you...so what does it matter... your such a straight loon if yoyr ignoring me then don't respond to me, stop running to the mods and ratting me out! If I say something, who cares |
|
Buzzetta
TCBF Member
Joined: January 2017
Posts: 395
|
Post by Buzzetta on Aug 8, 2021 12:35:18 GMT -8
I am quoting this for posterity. Ignoring you does not seem to work. So... Seriously, get some help. Rehab? Counseling? It is not normal, nor indicative of sound mind and body to keep being fixated on people who want nothing to do with someone. You? You go on and on and on and on... You reference it. You reference them. You poke to elicit responses. It seems to keep you up at night. Then when you get the response that you have coming to you, you go off the deep end. I find you creepy. How many other ways do I have to say it? I have asked you to stop referencing me, alluding to me, trying to stir the pot and forget about me. For some reason you are infatuated. I tried ignoring you and that does not seem to work. So my new way to try to get you to stop is to point out 'certain things'. How you can passively aggressively complain about people creating shill accounts, (which for the record I have never done) after you repeatedly admit to doing so in order to CREEP on people is disturbing in multiple ways. As I have said before, I cannot fathom making up a new identity in order to 'get to know' someone that has already said they do not want to have anything to do with me. That is some psychotic, serial killer, lock a girl in a basement, toss her down a well, and tell her to put lotion on her skin level craziness. Seek help. Shut the up You didn't have to respond to that thread....if I have something coming to me then bring it...I'm not trying to get to "know" twobitch you stupid ...Stop talking like there is something wrong with me like it's gonna trigger me...you are a straight up loon....I've thought you were a loon a long time ago, that hasn't changed....I created a shill account, get over it, it wasn't created for the reasons you are mentioning ....you viewed my profile 3 weeks ago, stop saying I'm a non entity if your checking out my profile loon, it's like your in love with me or something and it's actually making me uncomfortable, just like how you made that girl uncomfortable by putting cameras up around your house, like you think your important or something...go yourself you weirdo, and referencing silence of the lambs, your a dude I would never think of doing dumb shot like that...sorry are you a psychologist? Naw you are a wannabe who runs his mouth on the internet You ratted me out on that post and I got 5 points...you beg Dena to ban me permanently...how would you even know about a shill account if Kav didn't tell you...so what does it matter... your such a straight loon You already mentioned that the reason you were trying to contacting Two Piece was because you wanted to find out more information about him. That's called getting to know him. You are correct. I viewed your profile to take you off of block. I was slightly confused how to do that as you are the only person I have on block. I figured after all of your nonsensical ramblings that I was seemingly missing it was time to start responding since nothing seems to work with you. I put a ring doorbell in front of my front door. That is common here on Long Island. Yes, the reason was because she would just drop by unannounced after we stopped dating and it was kind of weird. When she realized that there was a ring doorbell at the front door she stopped doing that. So now... let us unpack your comments. It is raining pretty hard so I will pass the time here. As far as 'being in love with you"... laughable. I found you creepy from the very beginning which is why I stay away. Asking people to ask me questions about your arguments with another board member. You are a grown man. Act like one. Who cares if Two Piece did not like you? Why do you think asking someone to ask me about it would do something for you? You are excessively needy and don't face rejection well it seems. As I asked once before, do you do this in your personal life? Seek help. And to the mods and anyone else watching this from the CGC boards. This guy cannot seem to stop. He is even creating threads displaying his fixation on me. Nothing seems to work. So... now I will start responding. |
|
Kav told you....remember it is your choice...you respond to me (even passive aggressively) and I will respond to you...unless your posts are a figment of my imagination, as you claim I'm delusional and have a skewed version of reality
up