|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 25, 2021 11:05:53 GMT -8
Well I guess that's one way to look at it I'm not for forcing people to do  to their bodies. Their body, their right However, can't help but feel if they had their together to begin with, people would have just gotten vaccinated and we'd be done with it The fight against the pandemic was never just about the science, and that's the problem.
You can't be 'about the science' when you're arbitrarily and selectively picking and choosing which rules are being followed.
These are some of the anti-science conflicts happening in Canada right now.
- Once the employee is done working their shift, if they're unvaccinated they can't sit on the other side of the bar and have a drink.
- In jails, inmates are not being vaccinated without their consent, which means you have more rights in jail than you do out of it right now, concering the sweeping vaccine mandates which are causing 1000's if not millions of people to lose their jobs
- Here is the biggest one: The Canadian government DOES NOT respect previous natural infection by Covid-19 EVEN THOUGH IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN TO OFFER 10-20 TIMES STRONGER IMMUNITY THAN VACCINATION AND IT LASTS FOR LIFE.
Now why would we NOT follow the science?
Can anyone answer this with a proper answer other than it's NOT science they're following and it's just politics and political meddling?
This 'vaccination hesitancy' is only happening because people see the BS between the lines and know that they're being forced and co-erced.
Let me ask you: When does any person EVER feel like doing something if they're being tricked and forced into it?
|
|
MetalPSI™
TCBF Member
I don't make the internet, I just report it
Joined: March 2016
Posts: 2,742 
|
Post by MetalPSI™ on Oct 25, 2021 11:13:46 GMT -8
Yeah its  I'm vaxxed, just because it's easier to be than not. I respect people who can't or won't. This thing, if had been left alone, would have just burned through the population, then burned out. Government is going to Government. They screwed the pooch on day one |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 26, 2021 7:35:16 GMT -8
This thing, if had been left alone, would have just burned through the population, then burned out. I'm convinced that no matter what we did the results would have been similar.
In other news, the Canadian Federal Justice department has warned Trudeau about his overreach.
What is the scariest about all of this is how quiet and isidueous this is. Google blocks searches, the government has to back it's laws up but does so quietly so as not to let the general public know. This is all an attempt at quiet coercion and tyranny with no transparency.
Today's news:
From the article:
The federal Justice department has cautioned the Trudeau government that zero-tolerance vax mandates are unconstitutional; tests must be offered as Plan B.
The federal Transportation department quietly announced that the vaccine mandate for air and rail travellers would have to be put off until December, and even then domestic passengers can probably not be forced to be vaccinated. Negative tests likely will have to be accepted in lieu.
And there is almost certainly no legal way the House of Commons’ board of internal economy can compel MPs to get jabs, and probably not their political staffs, either. The MPs work for their constituents, not the board or the House. And it’s important that voters retain ultimate authority over them.
The Trudeau government knows all of this, of course. But it assumes many Canadians don’t. So all it’s tough talk about MPs getting vaccinated is nothing more than virtue signalling for political gain – just like its vaccine mandate for “all” civil servants that lets 70 per cent of federal employees quietly skirt the requirement.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 4, 2021 15:39:55 GMT -8
The CDC was supposed to be one of the premiere scientific and medical organizations in the world.
A few of my American friends have expressed concerns about the CDC being nothing more than a political arm as opposed to a scientific orgnanization.
Unfortunately, the last few months they've done little make me disagree. From taking on Critical Race Theory at the CDC to this video now.
Check out this discussion between the Senate and the new CDC director and how she doesn't answer a single question even though she has all the answers as a director. 
Apparently, the CDC has health records to EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN who has been infected with Covid but she can't answer any questions about statistics. Even important ones.
She doesn't know how many CDC employees are vaccinated, doesn't know how many are working remotely.
My fave part is when he asks how many CDC employees work from home and she won't answer it.
So he asks how many empty desks there are at the CDC and she avoids that too! 
It's ridiculous and if you think this sort of line of answers is OK from the premiere scientific medical organization in the world, I don't know what to say.
Why not just let the science speak? 
|
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Nov 4, 2021 15:50:13 GMT -8
An annoying disingenuous person, that should not have been appointed to the level of responsibility of the position. She goes to a Biolab 4 @ Detrick, and doesn't tape. Everybody between there and the Lobby entrance closed their door on her way out of the building.
Sad commentary on the decline of a bastion of purpose and pride for the People, being willingly converted to a political machine.
|
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Nov 4, 2021 15:52:07 GMT -8
BTW, who the hell appointed OSHA as the arbiter of Covid employee health science, and Judge and Jury?
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 5, 2021 10:19:03 GMT -8
An annoying disingenuous person, that should not have been appointed to the level of responsibility of the position. She goes to a Biolab 4 @ Detrick, and doesn't tape. Everybody between there and the Lobby entrance closed their door on her way out of the building. Sad commentary on the decline of a bastion of purpose and pride for the People, being willingly converted to a political machine. I just don't understand how anybody can trust a government scientific organization with NO transparency, NO accountability, NO truth and NO science. This video is like watching a sinking politician tread water to stay alive.
The people who allowed the Holocaust to happen weren't Nazis.
They were the general public that assisted the Nazis without protest and allowed it to freely happen to save their own skin.
Pathetic.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 7, 2021 11:20:00 GMT -8
Someone very close and dear to me has now had an adverse vaccine reaction.
They've had aches and pains for weeks. They've missed their period for the 1st time in their lives.
When I messaged a close doctor friend of mine asking what we can do, do you now what he said?
"There's nothing you can do."
The people who peer pressured people into doing something they don't want to do? You're the worst type of people because you do it for the safety of yourselves at the expense of others. |
|
|
|
Post by theCapraAegagrus on Nov 8, 2021 3:28:47 GMT -8
Someone very close and dear to me has now had an adverse vaccine reaction.
They've had aches and pains for weeks. They've missed their period for the 1st time in their lives.
When I messaged a close doctor friend of mine asking what we can do, do you now what he said?
"There's nothing you can do."
The people who peer pressured people into doing something they don't want to do? You're the worst type of people because you do it for the safety of yourselves at the expense of others. The #1 problem with "mandating" an EUA vaccine.
F^&* the gov.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 9, 2021 11:21:36 GMT -8
Someone very close and dear to me has now had an adverse vaccine reaction.
They've had aches and pains for weeks. They've missed their period for the 1st time in their lives.
When I messaged a close doctor friend of mine asking what we can do, do you now what he said?
"There's nothing you can do."
The people who peer pressured people into doing something they don't want to do? You're the worst type of people because you do it for the safety of yourselves at the expense of others. The #1 problem with "mandating" an EUA vaccine.
F^&* the gov.
I have now spoken to several women that have had adverse reactions to the vaccine. They are close people in my life and not strangers.
They all missed their periods after the shot.
But we can't talk about it. Google blocks it, Facebook takes it down, social media sites don't want you talking about it.
When a friend of mine had a debilitating reaction to the JJ vaccine this summer (he's pretty well known in comics as I see he has a lot of similar friends with me), he reported it to VAERS. He's now regularly in touch with the CDC and the FDA as well due to his debilitating condition from the vaccine.
VAERS told him that vaccine adverse reactions were severely under reported. They told him verbally that they think there was significantly more under reported vaccine adverse reactions than the general public was reporting. Other friends of mine called him a liar and told him he was making it up.
The women that I've spoken to? I asked them to be sure. None of them reported their adverse reactions, so they just slid under the radar.
What is happening is so scary that it's hard to believe.
And meanwhile, guys like Fauci, Francis Collins and Peter Daszak run Scott free.
This is a 17 minute video by two credible and honorable scientists who explain just how ridiculous Francis Collins' recent interview is. HE is director of the NIH, he is stepping down soon and the NIH may actually be responsible for starting the pandemic using Gain Of Function research in Wuhan but they have been obfuscating the investigation for almost 2 years now.
If you have 17 minutes it's a great video.
Francis Collins' great suggestion to mankind? Everyone including kids need to get vaccinated. his entire video is a CYA way of deflecting blame from the NIH, Fauci, him or Daszak.
And if you are responsible for perpetrating lies and giving up personal freedoms because you're a coward, you're not a nice person.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 9, 2021 23:30:01 GMT -8
It just gets better.
If only ONE of these scandals broke on the news it should be worldwide news but it seems that instead, we're getting front page headline news every day these days.
BMJ is a world famous medical journal.
BMJ just posted an article about a whistleblower who has accused Pfizer of falsifying safety and efficacy data during it's Phase 3 pivotal trials.
Read that again, because it's such big news it's hard to believe.
When I told everyone that there were concerns with Pfizer's phase 3 trials at the FDA meeting, which ANYBODY can freely listen to, nobody cared.
The advising doctor asked the FDA openly why there wasn't an investigation into some glaring discrepancies with Pfizer's phase 3 trials.
He was met with silence.
Well, here you are. Follow the science? More like follow the money.
Looks like I was right about big Pharma's corruption and the problems with science.
So, anyone still shooting up their young kids with this stuff? 
Someone let namisgr and DrBanner know? Thanks.
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports
In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. “As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science,” Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States.1
But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 10, 2021 0:28:07 GMT -8
An annoying disingenuous person, that should not have been appointed to the level of responsibility of the position. She goes to a Biolab 4 @ Detrick, and doesn't tape. Everybody between there and the Lobby entrance closed their door on her way out of the building. Sad commentary on the decline of a bastion of purpose and pride for the People, being willingly converted to a political machine. I'll bet you have some interesting things to say about these?
So, apparently doctors all over the US and Canada are getting fired for prescribing Ivermectin to treat Covid-19 - and yet here it is on the US Government / NIH website with dosage recommendations.
They had no idea this chart existed. It was updated July 2021.
You'll probably enjoy this too:
There are 3 drugs approved on that chart above.
Remdesivir, Ivermectin and Nitazoaxinide.
The US CMS (center for Medicare and Medicaid) has apparently released a memo stating that you get a 20% payout bonus if your doctor chooses to prescribe Remdesivir over the other two drugs.
So they are bribing for use of Remdesivir.
Are you able to confirm that?
|
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Nov 10, 2021 17:02:30 GMT -8
An annoying disingenuous person, that should not have been appointed to the level of responsibility of the position. She goes to a Biolab 4 @ Detrick, and doesn't tape. Everybody between there and the Lobby entrance closed their door on her way out of the building. Sad commentary on the decline of a bastion of purpose and pride for the People, being willingly converted to a political machine. I'll bet you have some interesting things to say about these?
So, apparently doctors all over the US and Canada are getting fired for prescribing Ivermectin to treat Covid-19 - and yet here it is on the US Government / NIH website with dosage recommendations.
They had no idea this chart existed. It was updated July 2021.
You'll probably enjoy this too:
There are 3 drugs approved on that chart above.
Remdesivir, Ivermectin and Nitazoaxinide.
The US CMS (center for Medicare and Medicaid) has apparently released a memo stating that you get a 20% payout bonus if your doctor chooses to prescribe Remdesivir over the other two drugs.
So they are bribing for use of Remdesivir.
Are you able to confirm that?
A few things, and will keep the answer brief, since I confuse people and riddle speak. Yes, there is a differential in CMS Coding reimbursement (and is used by all Health Insurance Providers), and can be as high as 40%+. The reason is the delivery of Rem restrictions, and method. It is a PBM adjudicated $ amount for the pharma end, and a Physician reimbursement for the prescription "labor". This is inclusive of storage, Local Decision/Determination, and Quality Care reimbursement that is tracked for all CMS Providers that accept CMS payment rates. It is not all Physicians. I would not describe it as a Bribe or a Bonus. Yes, there has been an increase of Credentialing (admitting privileges) Withdrawal for Healthcare Providers not agreeing to restrict treatment modalities, and this is a hospital based decision. It is a liability issue, and Hospitalists (salaried physicians employed as employees of the hospital) are not really involved, and is usually Regional Group and Super Group Physicians that can (and have) had their Hospital Credentialing affiliation cancelled for prescribing outside the Hospital protocol, as well as Sole Practitioners and small Partner offices. Yes, there has been an ongoing fed disagreement between NIH and CDC and FDA concerning prescription approvals, and the missing link is actually CMMS, since there is no regulatory authority or control of prescription criteria choices outside of HHS authority, so the Coding reimbursement is a t best interim approvals and subject to ICD/CPT allowances on any given day. CMMS has NO regulatory authority to restrict or expand treatment choices by the Healthcare Provider. outside of the wallet restrictions. What makes the entire reimbursement situation laughable, is that the Provider need not agree to the reimbursement amounts allowed by CMMS but can still treat Medicare-Medicaid recipients, and the patient is responsible for the amount that exceeds the CMMS approved reimbursement limits. The tool that is used by the Providers-including Hospitals and Urgent Care, etc., is known as an ABN: Advanced Beneficiary Notice, that any Medicare Patient must sign to receive care. Yes, the Patient can refuse, by checking the box on the form that limits treatment, but good luck with getting treated. There is the Right to appeal, but...... You may remember my multi-page explanation of all this to Sheldon and 500, who were both adamant in their righteousness, until sheepishly leaving the field of battle. After all, I am only a "Billing Clerk", is what I recall is the term used by 500. I am so ashamed. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 11, 2021 16:40:20 GMT -8
Are you able to confirm that?
A few things, and will keep the answer brief, since I confuse people and riddle speak. Yes, there is a differential in CMS Coding reimbursement (and is used by all Health Insurance Providers), and can be as high as 40%+. The reason is the delivery of Rem restrictions, and method. It is a PBM adjudicated $ amount for the pharma end, and a Physician reimbursement for the prescription "labor". This is inclusive of storage, Local Decision/Determination, and Quality Care reimbursement that is tracked for all CMS Providers that accept CMS payment rates. It is not all Physicians. I would not describe it as a Bribe or a Bonus. Yes, there has been an increase of Credentialing (admitting privileges) Withdrawal for Healthcare Providers not agreeing to restrict treatment modalities, and this is a hospital based decision. It is a liability issue, and Hospitalists (salaried physicians employed as employees of the hospital) are not really involved, and is usually Regional Group and Super Group Physicians that can (and have) had their Hospital Credentialing affiliation cancelled for prescribing outside the Hospital protocol, as well as Sole Practitioners and small Partner offices. Yes, there has been an ongoing fed disagreement between NIH and CDC and FDA concerning prescription approvals, and the missing link is actually CMMS, since there is no regulatory authority or control of prescription criteria choices outside of HHS authority, so the Coding reimbursement is a t best interim approvals and subject to ICD/CPT allowances on any given day. CMMS has NO regulatory authority to restrict or expand treatment choices by the Healthcare Provider. outside of the wallet restrictions. What makes the entire reimbursement situation laughable, is that the Provider need not agree to the reimbursement amounts allowed by CMMS but can still treat Medicare-Medicaid recipients, and the patient is responsible for the amount that exceeds the CMMS approved reimbursement limits. The tool that is used by the Providers-including Hospitals and Urgent Care, etc., is known as an ABN: Advanced Beneficiary Notice, that any Medicare Patient must sign to receive care. Yes, the Patient can refuse, by checking the box on the form that limits treatment, but good luck with getting treated. There is the Right to appeal, but...... You may remember my multi-page explanation of all this to Sheldon and 500, who were both adamant in their righteousness, until sheepishly leaving the field of battle. After all, I am only a "Billing Clerk", is what I recall is the term used by 500. I am so ashamed. Thanks for explaining this.
I have something new to share and I hope it works.
I will give any person I personally know $50 to watch 1 hour of this video. That's $50 / per hour I will pay you.
You heard me: Watch it from 1:07:30 - 1:58:08 and from 2:21:20 - 2:30:04 and then post your thoughts in here on how you feel about the video.
I will then quiz you privately just to make sure you watched it and then I will send you $50.
That's it.
This video is held by Senator Johnson and is a panel to share information on vaccine injuries. It is NOT an anti-vax video as everyone in the video has been vaccinated.
They are only sharing their experiences and expertise about data transparency and support for the vaccine injured (of which they have none right now)
It's 3 hours long and has a panel of proper experts. There are no demon sex doctors, y'all!
Not many people actually put their money where their mouth is. I always do.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 13, 2021 18:58:30 GMT -8
YouTube has decided to censor a video full of vaccine casualties telling their story along with some highly educated people asking for some data transparency for the causalities.
Do you guys remember when everyone on the CGC boards was worried last summer about young people getting myocarditis from Covid-19 and that was used as justification to keep kids out of schools and locked down all year even though kids had (and STILL HAVE) negligible risk from Covid-19? I was called a baby killer by tth2.
But now kids are getting myocarditis from the vaccines and nobody seems to care. Whjo is really the baby killer?
Weird, huh?
So far, all Pfizer has released is press releases and sound bites. No data from the clinical trials will be released from Pfizer for peer review until 2025.
This is a great video that shows Pfizer's own data (what little they have released) and how to pick it apart scientifically.
Nobody can answer why there are just as many deaths in the placebo group as the vaccinated group. Not even Pfizer.
If you're performing a public health campaign, transparency is a must.
If there's no transparency, it's not public health, it's a public experiment.
|
|
to their bodies. Their body, their right
