|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 1, 2021 7:37:22 GMT -8
Well, in case you missed it, it's now pretty much accepted scientifically that if you've been infected with Covid-19 you will have long lasting and quite possibly lifelong immunity:
Determining the duration of protective immunity to infection by SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for understanding and predicting the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical studies now indicate that immunity will be long-lasting.
AND
People who recover from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades, although viral variants could dampen some of the protection they offer.
-------------------------------------------------
Why would this great news not be pushed out on every media outlet?
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 1, 2021 7:55:45 GMT -8
Co-incidentally, the company that owns Ivermectin, Merck, has stated that Ivermectin does not work for Covid-19 AND has called it a 'dangerous drug' after administering Ivermectin 4 billion times safely. Apparently, even high doses of Ivermectin were not dangerous in the past but are now.
India on the other hand seems to be eradicating Covid-19 using Ivermectin and the Indian Bar Association is suing the WHO and their own medical industry for suppressing information about the efficacy of Ivermectin, stating they've been suppressing Ivermectin's effectiveness to gain Emergency Use Authorization, which they would not have been able to gain if Ivermectin was shown to be effective.
Merck, who owns Ivermectin was granted $361MIL by the US government to find a 'cure' for Covid-19 and it looks like they now have a new pill.
I think to me the fascinating thing about all of this is how we can have such conflicting views on something that should be scientific and how the highly politicized, corporate, monetary environment in the US is following a very different narrative than countries who are not as politicized or driven by corporate greed.
How many people think this is all just a co-incidence?
|
|
|
Post by mrwoogieman on Oct 1, 2021 8:34:02 GMT -8
Well, in case you missed it, it's now pretty much accepted scientifically that if you've been infected with Covid-19 you will have long lasting and quite possibly lifelong immunity:
Determining the duration of protective immunity to infection by SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for understanding and predicting the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical studies now indicate that immunity will be long-lasting.
AND
People who recover from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades, although viral variants could dampen some of the protection they offer.
-------------------------------------------------
Why would this great news not be pushed out on every media outlet?
Money and control, those are the two reasons.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 4, 2021 12:44:44 GMT -8
Why would this great news not be pushed out on every media outlet?
Money and control, those are the two reasons. Isn't that always the reason.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 6, 2021 11:55:54 GMT -8
All of the people that are gladly giving away basic human rights like freedom to assemble and freedom of choice and free speech don't have the long sight to see what's coming.
We fight for our immediate safety regardless of the consequences they will bring because most have never been down this path before.
My family has. That's why they left communist Europe, left everything behind, walked through the mountains at night with children in their arms and moved to a free country.
Now those freedoms are taken away and what is unfolding is something terrifying and ghastly.
I just got a message from someone whose friend was kicked out of a university residence by their roommates because the person kicked out wasn't vaccinated.
But they all partied for the past 2 years during the pandemic when there weren't any vaccines with no issues. They all do drugs, they all have sex with multiple partners but they're 'worried about their safety' because one person is unvaccinated.
They also refuse to refund their rent even though they're not allowed back in.
Furthermore, this person may have Lyme disease and may be ineligible for the vaccine.
This is what the government's poorly thought out, illogical rules have done to society and it infuriates me so badly I'm not sure what to do.
This all sounds reasonable based on what is expected of everyone.
|
|
|
Post by theCapraAegagrus on Oct 7, 2021 2:44:57 GMT -8
I just got a message from someone whose friend was kicked out of a university residence by their roommates because the person kicked out wasn't vaccinated.
But they all partied for the past 2 years during the pandemic when there weren't any vaccines with no issues. They all do drugs, they all have sex with multiple partners but they're 'worried about their safety' because one person is unvaccinated.
This all sounds reasonable based on what is expected of everyone. Being scared of the un-vaccinated when you're vaccinated just doesn't make any logical sense.
However, for some reason, my older brother is the same way. His whole family is vaccinated, but they wouldn't see our mom for her birthday until 2 weeks after she got the vaccine. I just went to their home on July 30th, and we saw them on September 4th at a restaurant with no masks or social distancing.
Can't fix stupid, and I'm surprised that my brother is this stupid. He told my mom on a phone call, "now we just need to get Chris vaccinated". My mom is pro-choice. "Need" to get me vaccinated? What a completely idiotic thing for him to say.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 7, 2021 14:39:46 GMT -8
I just got a message from someone whose friend was kicked out of a university residence by their roommates because the person kicked out wasn't vaccinated.
But they all partied for the past 2 years during the pandemic when there weren't any vaccines with no issues. They all do drugs, they all have sex with multiple partners but they're 'worried about their safety' because one person is unvaccinated.
This all sounds reasonable based on what is expected of everyone. Being scared of the un-vaccinated when you're vaccinated just doesn't make any logical sense.
However, for some reason, my older brother is the same way. His whole family is vaccinated, but they wouldn't see our mom for her birthday until 2 weeks after she got the vaccine. I just went to their home on July 30th, and we saw them on September 4th at a restaurant with no masks or social distancing.
Can't fix stupid, and I'm surprised that my brother is this stupid. He told my mom on a phone call, "now we just need to get Chris vaccinated". My mom is pro-choice. "Need" to get me vaccinated? What a completely idiotic thing for him to say.
So much of the pandemic has just been a string of lies tied together.
And yet, even though you expose the lies nobody adjusts their story.
Vaccinated people are now afraid of unvaccinated people.
Well, if you're afraid the vaccine doesn't work, why even get it?
It's what a friend of mine calls 'Clown World'
And this post is not anti-vaccine. It's anti- stupidity.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 7, 2021 15:01:55 GMT -8
Money and control, those are the two reasons. Isn't that always the reason.
Clown world strikes again.
For almost 2 years, we've been told that Fauci is the savior. He's been leading the fight worldwide against this pandemic along with the NIH. The triumvirate was Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak and Francis Collins, director of the NIH.
When calls to check into a lab leak in Wuhan came up early in the pandemic, Peter Daszak of the NIH penned a Lancet article on Feb 2020 before the pandemic started which stated that '27 scientists in solidarity' believe that the lab leak theory was a conspiracy theory with no evidence, proof, science or reason.
This was an obvious smoke screen that I questioned as far back as last spring. How could I have known, not being a scientist?
Well, how could Daszak and his cronies KNOW it ESD a conspiracy theory without an investigation into the lab?
He couldn't have know the virus DIDN'T escape without an investigation.
He only could have known if it DID escape because he was involved in the research at the lab.
And if he DID know and stated it wasn't a lab leak, it would have been to hide the fact that he knew.
And that is what these 18 scientists suspected when they penned this paper after Peter Daszak concluded from his conflict of interest investigation in Wuhan that the 'lab leak' was the least likely explanation.
well, the WHEELS ARE IN MOTION.
So far we've seen that Fauci has been caught lying (see quote above) about his involvement and the Gain of Function research that was performed in Wuhan.
The next card to fall was Francis Collins. He will be resigning as Director of the NIH shortly. The timing is pretty dubious.
Here is the final piece.
Peter Daszak is now being asked to quit for his part in covering up the investigation into the Lab Leak theory.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been consistent and persistent in my own personal belief that the lab leak theory was a viable theory.
You could tell by the smoke screens that Daszak was throwing up that something was not right.
I got berated by many CGC board members for being consistent in believing that a proper investigation into the lab leak was necessary.
Board members like DrBanner, tth2 and many others ridiculed me mercilessly for saying it could have been either man made or a lab leak.
The resident 'CGC scientist' namisgr toed the PC partisan line and bought Daszak's statement hook line and sinker, as was evidenced by a statement he erased and corrected to change the meaning once I noted on one of his posts that Daszak's WHO investigation was not exhaustive and just an opinion.
Why am I typing this? Am I trying to be contentious? No.
This pandemic has created a lot of enemies among us over differences of opinion and it would be really REALLY nice if people actually followed the science instead of pretending they do and adjusted their beliefs based on what is true and real.
We now see that Fauci has lied, Daszak has lied and these people continue to be trusted by the general public. It's mystifying.
It would be nice if people apologized when they were wrong, justice was brought to those who may be responsible for the deaths of millions of people and we could turn back the clock and be a peaceful world again but I'm pretty sure that ship has sailed and we are never going back to the old world.
We've now shown with evidence that you CAN'T trust the scientists and you CAN'T trust the politicians and I'm afraid that the legacy of this pandemic might just be less trust among everyone moving forward.
I know I'll never blindly trust authority again.
Also
I EFFING TOLD YOU SO!!!
And just to be clear, I forgive anyone who antagonized me. I just don't forget.
I like being wrong because I always learn something, but I think I LOVE being right more.
|
|
|
Post by theCapraAegagrus on Oct 8, 2021 2:36:20 GMT -8
Being scared of the un-vaccinated when you're vaccinated just doesn't make any logical sense.
However, for some reason, my older brother is the same way. His whole family is vaccinated, but they wouldn't see our mom for her birthday until 2 weeks after she got the vaccine. I just went to their home on July 30th, and we saw them on September 4th at a restaurant with no masks or social distancing.
Can't fix stupid, and I'm surprised that my brother is this stupid. He told my mom on a phone call, "now we just need to get Chris vaccinated". My mom is pro-choice. "Need" to get me vaccinated? What a completely idiotic thing for him to say.
So much of the pandemic has just been a string of lies tied together.
And yet, even though you expose the lies nobody adjusts their story.
Vaccinated people are now afraid of unvaccinated people.
Well, if you're afraid the vaccine doesn't work, why even get it?
It's what a friend of mine calls 'Clown World'
And this post is not anti-vaccine. It's anti- stupidity.
Yeah, I'm pro-choice. Anyone wants to get the vaccine of their own autonomy? Absolutely fine. The notion that 'I need to get vaccinated' is insanely ludicrous.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 8, 2021 9:59:45 GMT -8
This picture is from a woman in India.
These are the ingredients in the health kids handed out to households in India. Along with these treatments, you got a thermometer and alcohol wipes.
The entire kit cost $2.65 and is believed to have almost eradicated Covid-19 in many districts in India, some with over 200 million people in them, reducing the numbers of infections down to dozens or only a few 100.
The regions that did not use these kits are still ravaged by Covid with 1000s or 10,000's of infections.
This is a news article from India documenting how they distributed 50 lakh kits (that's 5 million kits)
You're not seeing any of this on mainstream news. Why is that?
And why isn't science around the world asking how India, a country with 1.4 billion people, has less infections than the USA with a population of only 360MIL and much better infrastructure?
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 8, 2021 10:41:47 GMT -8
Co-incidentally, the company that owns Ivermectin, Merck, has stated that Ivermectin does not work for Covid-19 AND has called it a 'dangerous drug' after administering Ivermectin 4 billion times safely. Apparently, even high doses of Ivermectin were not dangerous in the past but are now.
India on the other hand seems to be eradicating Covid-19 using Ivermectin and the Indian Bar Association is suing the WHO and their own medical industry for suppressing information about the efficacy of Ivermectin, stating they've been suppressing Ivermectin's effectiveness to gain Emergency Use Authorization, which they would not have been able to gain if Ivermectin was shown to be effective.
Merck, who owns Ivermectin was granted $361MIL by the US government to find a 'cure' for Covid-19 and it looks like they now have a new pill.
I think to me the fascinating thing about all of this is how we can have such conflicting views on something that should be scientific and how the highly politicized, corporate, monetary environment in the US is following a very different narrative than countries who are not as politicized or driven by corporate greed.
How many people think this is all just a co-incidence?
The mainstream news seems to be absolutely swamped with news about 'Ivermectin overdose spikes' and how unsafe Ivermectin is. This is a very disingenuous spin by the media.
Merck themselves, who own the rights to Ivermectin continue to be disingenuous. Here is a link to Merck's statement on Ivermectin:
This is what they state:
A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.
-----------------------------------------------------------
For one, you can check the safety data yourself.
I used vigiaccess.org, a site that works WITH the WHO and you can look up the Adverse reactions of Ivermectin.
3.74 BILLION doses have been administered and out of nearly 4BIL doses, there are 5695 adverse effects.
Now compare that to current vaccine adverse effects (last I looked a few weeks ago there were about 14,000 adverse effects reported just in the US)
Here is a study that actually studied adverse effects while administering high doses of Ivermectin:
What did this study conclude?
Conclusions
Although within this review the safety of high-dose ivermectin appears to be comparable to standard doses, there are not enough data to support a recommendation for its use in higher-than-approved doses. Ocular adverse events, despite being transient, are of concern in onchocerciasis patients. These data can inform programme managers and guide operational research activities as new approaches for the use of ivermectin are evaluated.
------------------------------
So how does a drug that's been administered 3.74 BIL times with a worldwide total of 5700 adverse effects get wrongly labelled as unsafe?
That's a great question, but it happened right before Merck got awarded $361MIL to find a cure for Covid
---------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, when you read the news articles about 'spiking' overdoses, there is a media frenzy making it sound like people are falling on the streets overdosing on Ivermectin.
Just a quick read into the 'spike' in Ivermectin overdoses shows about 300 people in total in the US have taken too much Ivermectin and overdosed. That's 300 people who are and took something in too large of a dosage.
Does this make Ivermectin unsafe?
Where is the media frenzy for the spikes in overdoses whereby 1000's and 1000's of people have died from overdoses or suicides due to pandemic lockdown measures? Nowhere to be seen.
Why am I posting this? I'm hoping it helps people see between the lines on what is being pushed on the media as news when it's really just manipulation.
Don't hate the messenger. Hate the message.
Here is a screenshot from the Vigi website on the safety profile of Ivermectin.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 13, 2021 13:21:22 GMT -8
We are now 2 years into the pandemic and now in Saskatchewan, they're doing this. This is a news station local to there. They are starting a detention center for vaccination non-compliance and enforcing mask measures. Anyone still not worried about personal freedoms yet? COVID Enforcement Team and Secure Location for COVID Isolation Saskatchewan Health Authority now says it is putting together a COVID Enforcement Team. The group will be made up of mostly retired police officers who have special constable status.
The information was conveyed in the most recent Physicians Town Hall Meeting. Medical Health Officer Dr. Johnmark Opondo says the purpose of the CET is to enforce public health measures, in particular proof of vaccination non-compliance at businesses that are not typically regulated by public health inspectors. They will also be charged with enforcing masking public health measures.
In addition to a COVID Enforcement Team and a on-line form or phone number to report on fellow citizens, the government is also setting up a secure isolation site for those deemed needing to be isolated by a medical health officer.
“Public Health Inspectors and police, once the Medical Health Officer has signed a form for secure isolation, will be involved in assisting and transporting and moving people into the secure isolation site.”
This site, expected to be ready in the next three weeks, is going to be located at the Saskatchewan Hospital in North Battleford.
They refer to those sent to the secure isolation site as clients, not detainees. However they will be there under a detention order.
The town hall heard the CET will likely be out in the field in 1-2 weeks.
|
|
|
Post by barry on Oct 14, 2021 8:10:23 GMT -8
Joe Rogan confronts/exposes/destroys Sanjay Gupta and CNN's lies about Ivermectin.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 21, 2021 20:46:38 GMT -8
Joe Rogan confronts/exposes/destroys Sanjay Gupta and CNN's lies about Ivermectin.
It's surreal to me that one of the world's largest news networks can blatantly lie with no accountability.
And not only blatantly lie but double down when called on it. The WP calls them out on it.
Ivermectin has not only been administered 4 billion times to humans (4 BILLION, not million) but it's only had 5000 reported adverse reactions.
Covid vaccines in the US have had 10,000's of adverse reports. So it's a multitude of times safer than the Covid vaccines.
Truth doesn't anymore. Only politics, which lies you can get away with and power.
|
|
MetalPSI™
TCBF Member
I don't make the internet, I just report it
Joined: March 2016
Posts: 2,742
|
Post by MetalPSI™ on Oct 23, 2021 13:27:49 GMT -8
Well I guess that's one way to look at it I'm not for forcing people to do to their bodies. Their body, their right However, can't help but feel if they had their together to begin with, people would have just gotten vaccinated and we'd be done with it
|
|