davidpg
TCBF Member
Joined: January 2021
Posts: 114
|
Post by davidpg on Feb 2, 2021 12:47:31 GMT -8
Every single one of your posts are one line, pot. Every single one meaning all 6,601 posts? Yes.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Feb 2, 2021 18:30:51 GMT -8
You know, knowing what we know now, that Fauci was sending Federal money to fund GOF research, and that Peter Daszak was spending $40MIL or $100MIL of the Pentagon's money on the same sort of research, you have to wonder how much Trump actually knew about this.
He was obviously anti-China in his public approach to the pandemic (and rightfully so based on what we know now, it wasn't just him being racist) but if he knew about the funding and the research going on, his hands may have been tied somewhat with what he may have been able to talk about and share, especially if the military was involved in the research.
I know a lot of people get upset and judge things on the surface as they appear but there's always more to a public face than politics shows and I'm aware of that.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Feb 3, 2021 13:57:25 GMT -8
Looks like it's beginning.
With nothing left to lose and a supportive network of likeminded entrepreneurs at their side, at least 250 business owners across Canada plan to reopen on February 11 in defiance of their respective governments.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Feb 3, 2021 14:04:20 GMT -8
Looks like it's beginning.
With nothing left to lose and a supportive network of likeminded entrepreneurs at their side, at least 250 business owners across Canada plan to reopen on February 11 in defiance of their respective governments.
Can't wait to see them get arrested
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Feb 5, 2021 10:26:01 GMT -8
Alina Chan is a molecular biologist and biochemist at the Broad Instute of MIT and Harvard. Google it. This isn't some hack from a fake science journal.
She was one of the earliest whistleblowers trying to share her scientific evidence showing that Covid-19 may have leaked from a laboratory rather than be of natural origin. She got slammed by the media and scientists who had vested interests in opposing her but the tide is turning.
If you want to follow her timeline on Twitter about the Covid related timeline and genetic data, this is ONE FREAKING INTERESTING Twitter thread.
She documents everything including weird additions and subtractions to the data that is sometimes inexplicable. It's all just gaslighting being exposed.
People like her and Bret Weinstein are fighting for the truth in spite of opposition.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Feb 5, 2021 10:58:46 GMT -8
More Twitter info from Chan.
From the Twitter feed:
The overarching message of Yan's 2nd report is that there has been unscientific behavior surrounding the reporting of SARS2-like CoVs. Based on this, they speculate that these genomes are coordinated fakes to make SARS2 look natural.
Also from the feed:
One of my takeaways from researching SARS2 origins is that the scientific community has been struggling with a research integrity crisis, now made more obvious by the pandemic. Scientists & journals seem to have forgotten what to do when there are research integrity failures.
I wonder what namisgr would say about this?
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Feb 5, 2021 13:42:15 GMT -8
Another interesting Twitter read by Chan.
The summary below from the thread?
The top points: 1. There are likely unpublished virus genomes closely related to SARS2. 2. The spike is generally modified alone before cloning into the larger genomic backbone. 3. Cloning can occur seamlessly. No need for RE site insertions! 4. It can be done in weeks-months.
|
|
|
Post by barry on Feb 6, 2021 6:10:14 GMT -8
When Will Life Return to Normal? In 7 Years at Today's Vaccine Rates
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on Feb 6, 2021 12:03:00 GMT -8
When Will Life Return to Normal? In 7 Years at Today's Vaccine Rates
That was a remarkably quick read, and alarming as I thought we (meaning everyone) would be able to get the vaccine out to people much quicker. I can’t even begin to wrap my head around the process taking years.
|
|
|
Post by barry on Feb 7, 2021 7:54:30 GMT -8
When Will Life Return to Normal? In 7 Years at Today's Vaccine Rates
That was a remarkably quick read, and alarming as I thought we (meaning everyone) would be able to get the vaccine out to people much quicker. I can’t even begin to wrap my head around the process taking years. Same. The development was impressive. But the vaccination rates are too slow. They spent too much time on things like race-based allocation.
|
|
davidpg
TCBF Member
Joined: January 2021
Posts: 114
|
Post by davidpg on Feb 7, 2021 11:25:58 GMT -8
That was a remarkably quick read, and alarming as I thought we (meaning everyone) would be able to get the vaccine out to people much quicker. I can’t even begin to wrap my head around the process taking years. Same. The development was impressive. But the vaccination rates are too slow. They spent too much time on things like race-based allocation. I've been discussing this point with Roy for the last few weeks. I think that interest in getting this vaccine by the gen pop will wane exponentially as this year progresses. And I don't necessarily think it's not on purpose.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Feb 7, 2021 14:33:16 GMT -8
When Will Life Return to Normal? In 7 Years at Today's Vaccine Rates
Interesting. Canada is expecting half it's population to be vaccinated by mid summer and everyone who wants a vaccine is expected to be vaccinated by the end of 2021.
This pandemic will be over when the politicians decide it's over and move onto the next thing the media will focus on.
|
|
|
Post by barry on Feb 8, 2021 9:16:26 GMT -8
US judge: IRS can’t keep coronavirus money from inmates
The same for the second stimulus payment. The IRS says on its website.
“Individuals will not be denied Economic Impact Payments solely because they are incarcerated,” “An incarcerated individual may be issued a payment if all eligibility requirements are met and the individual filed a 2019 tax return that was processed by the IRS.”
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Feb 9, 2021 7:44:07 GMT -8
Beijing’s tight grip on WHO team casts doubt on prospects for scientists’ visit
-----------------------------------
As expected, between China's iron grip on what they allowed investigators to do, the amount of time that has passed since the outbreak and Peter Daszak being the lead hand in the investigation (who obviously has a massive conflict of interest in investigating a virus leak in a city where he has already done millions of dollars of lab research on gain of function research on Coronaviruses) most experts quoted in the article don't believe the new investigation will come up with anything concrete.
I'm waiting for the report to come out but I just don't see it being as thorough as it would have been if China was willing to co-operate more or if there wasn't someone with a heavily vested interest on the team.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Feb 9, 2021 7:52:02 GMT -8
This is an article from Nature that discusses how the team was chosen. Apparently, only members from within the WHO's own investigative team were chosen with no outside members allowed.
Meet the scientists investigating the origins of the COVID pandemicFrom the article: But Christian Drosten, a virologist at the Charité hospital in Berlin, notes that invitations to apply for the team were only sent to members of the WHO’s Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN), a closed group with experience in outbreak response. Many researchers with relevant expertise were not given the opportunity to apply, says Drosten, who received the e-mail, but missed the invitation while on holiday. “They could and should have issued this as a more open call.”
Although the team members are highly qualified, eight out of ten are men and investigators from Europe dominate the group; none is from Africa or South America, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Georgetown University, who is based in Seattle, Washington. “It could be more representative of the larger global scientific community,” she says.
She also says that Daszak’s ties to the WIV could raise a conflict of interest, given that the lab has been at the centre of unsubstantiated claims that the virus accidentally leaked from there.
Daszak says that he has been transparent about his work in China. The trust he has built with researchers there will help the team to gain a deeper understanding of the pandemic’s early days, he says.
|
|