|
|
Post by Stu on Feb 11, 2017 10:51:50 GMT -8
Here's an interesting 10.0.  link  That's both an interesting 10 and an interesting #12! I believe something went wrong with printing process and it took 23 years to reprint... And nice ring! According to most Facebook  this is a variant cover, not a reprint. Yeah, a variant cover 23 years later. |
|
|
|
Post by Siggy's Tar Dust® on Feb 11, 2017 10:54:26 GMT -8
That's both an interesting 10 and an interesting #12! I believe something went wrong with printing process and it took 23 years to reprint... And nice ring! According to most Facebook this is a variant cover, not a reprint. Yeah, a variant cover 23 years later. It's gotten that bad?? |
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on Feb 11, 2017 10:58:46 GMT -8
According to most Facebook this is a variant cover, not a reprint. Yeah, a variant cover 23 years later. It's gotten that bad?? Oh...it's that bad alright.  link |
|
|
|
Post by Bats on Feb 11, 2017 11:06:37 GMT -8
According to most Facebook this is a variant cover, not a reprint. Yeah, a variant cover 23 years later. That is pushing it little |
|
|
|
Post by Bats on Feb 11, 2017 11:17:46 GMT -8
Is that 70%+ of all submissions in 2016 were classed as variants? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2017 11:19:20 GMT -8
According to most Facebook this is a variant cover, not a reprint. Yeah, a variant cover 23 years later. It's gotten that bad?? But remember...if you challenge these , YOU are the problem, YOU are the "aggressive poster." Millenial snowflakes.  |
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on Feb 11, 2017 11:24:50 GMT -8
Is that 70%+ of all submissions in 2016 were classed as variants? No, according to Valiantman it's the comic book date. So >70% of all comic books printed in 2016 that were submitted to CGC are classified as variants by CGC. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2017 11:29:00 GMT -8
Oh...it's that bad alright. linkKeep in mind that those are submissions for comics DATED the years stated, not overall submissions for a given year. See the 1991-1992 bump? Valiant!  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2017 11:29:18 GMT -8
Is that 70%+ of all submissions in 2016 were classed as variants? No, according to Valiantman it's the comic book date. So >70% of all comic books printed in 2016 that were submitted to CGC are classified as variants by CGC. Right. |
|
|
|
Post by Bats on Feb 11, 2017 11:36:41 GMT -8
Is that 70%+ of all submissions in 2016 were classed as variants? No, according to Valiantman it's the comic book date. So >70% of all comic books printed in 2016 that were submitted to CGC are classified as variants by CGC. Gotcha, thanks! |
|
|
|
Post by Jimmers Nice Guy on Feb 11, 2017 12:18:09 GMT -8
i'm low grade...
|
|
MetalPSI™
TCBF Member
I don't make the internet, I just report it
Joined: March 2016
Posts: 2,742 
|
Post by MetalPSI™ on Feb 11, 2017 16:17:30 GMT -8
I'm low grade but present nice
|
|
|
|
Post by FiveZero on Feb 11, 2017 18:07:07 GMT -8
I have little or no collector value...
|
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on Feb 11, 2017 21:52:56 GMT -8
I'm a little late with this, and I never saw the book in person, but there's a promo comic from '49 or '50 that received a 10.0. It's some sort of Dental/toothpaste giveaway and 4 or 5 were found and all graded at 9.8 or above by CGC.
There was a thread on the "old" boards about this several years ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmers Nice Guy on Feb 11, 2017 22:17:20 GMT -8
I remember that thread.Not the promo though..I remember it being a Christian comic though..
|
|
this is a variant cover, not a reprint. Yeah, a variant cover 23 years later.
