|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Mar 24, 2023 10:45:47 GMT -8
Yes, you have it 100% right. Why show examples of past behavior, no way that could show a pattern of thought right? I have a hard time believing you're that hyperbolic that you honestly believe "Libs never admit to being wrong". That's like me saying all Regressives are fascist, racist, democracy hating insurrectionists, when it's only really about 30% of them. admitting being wrong 10 years ago is now a 'pattern of behavior' I guess vintagecomics  Let me rephrase-I have been arguing with liberals for 30 years online and in person-not once has a single liberal ever admitted being wrong ever. I have, and so have conservatives like vintage. Libs-nope. So if it makes you feel more safe I will say I have never ever witnessed a lib admitting being wrong despite thousands of encounters rather than a blanket statement that 'libs never admit being wrong' (altho I suspect strongly this is true to a small margin of error). Oh you liberals Sad. |
|
|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Mar 24, 2023 10:47:06 GMT -8
Deflect and project, the conservative way. Better to focus on this as opposed to the actual point that was being made. Sad. #4 Deflect and project, the conservative way. Better to focus on this as opposed to the actual point that was being made. Sad. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 24, 2023 10:47:41 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 24, 2023 20:39:20 GMT -8
"I feel like telling my boss off again next time he hollers at me."
"What do you mean 'again'?".
"I felt like doing it once before".
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Mar 26, 2023 15:06:02 GMT -8
Liberal: "You admitted you were wrong 10 years ago!!! Therefore youre wrong!!! Omg!!!" Libs never admit being wrong, ever. Anyone who can admit being wrong has credibility. This is what libs don't comprehend. Yes, you have it 100% right. Why show examples of past behavior, no way that could show a pattern of thought right? I have a hard time believing you're that hyperbolic that you honestly believe "Libs never admit to being wrong". My 'past behavior' was based on a fraudulent study that the Lancet published and then retracted a decade later. Even the scientists were tricked. Once I read that the study was retracted my opinion changed. So I was actually FOLLOWING THE SCIENCE.  And Libs are never wrong. They just broke the world economy, suppressed human rights, censored free speech and used the world's population as guinea pigs by mandating an experimental drug and coercing people into taking it against their will. And yet almost none of them will admit it was wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Mar 26, 2023 15:11:29 GMT -8
Yes, you have it 100% right. Why show examples of past behavior, no way that could show a pattern of thought right? I have a hard time believing you're that hyperbolic that you honestly believe "Libs never admit to being wrong". That's like me saying all Regressives are fascist, racist, democracy hating insurrectionists, when it's only really about 30% of them. admitting being wrong 10 years ago is now a 'pattern of behavior' I guess vintagecomics Let me rephrase-I have been arguing with liberals for 30 years online and in person-not once has a single liberal ever admitted being wrong ever. I have, and so have conservatives like vintage. Libs-nope. So if it makes you feel more safe I will say I have never ever witnessed a lib admitting being wrong despite thousands of encounters rather than a blanket statement that 'libs never admit being wrong' (altho I suspect strongly this is true to a small margin of error). Oh you liberals I have been arguing for about 3 years now that Liberals seem to have some sort of cognitive dissonance or impairment but they don't see it. Most Liberals I know argue that Liberals are 100% right and Conservatives are 100% wrong. That is STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. And yet they believe it. They literally believe in the impossible. And you can point out errors unequivocally and they won't admit them. We now KNOW BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT that young people are dying at higher rates than pre pandemic due to lockdown measures. We know it did real harm to children's development. We now know that the vaccines ARE NOT AS EFFECTIVE as advertised. We now know that they ARE NOT AS SAFE as advertised. We have now PROVEN that the Liberal governments in Canada and US suppressed free speech and struck down real, scientific information in favor of a political narrative. In court. It's a fact. I mean, these things are black and white and 100% proven. And none of them will ever admit it. |
|
microchip
TCBF Member
Joined: February 2021
Posts: 90
|
Post by microchip on Apr 21, 2023 15:51:18 GMT -8
More proof of crazy...an "antidote" for the vaccine Yeah, I'm trusting the guy who pushed hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.  You do know that IVM has been the go-to gold standard medication used as a prophylactic by virologists working in virology labs, for decades, yes? |
|
microchip
TCBF Member
Joined: February 2021
Posts: 90
|
Post by microchip on Apr 21, 2023 15:55:52 GMT -8
You don't seem to understand how HQC and IVM work. SARS-Cov-2 is a virus. Covid-19 is the illness that the body reacts with once the body is infected with the virus. They don't cure Covid. They are ANTIVIRAL meaning they KILL VIRUSES. Meaning they KILL THE VIRUS before it infects the body and the body gets Covid-19. Just like iodine mist spray in the nostrils. If you spray your nostrils daily with iodine mist, you kill SARS-Cov-2 where it's stored BEFORE it infects the body. And I would trust Peter McCullough one of the most respected heart doctors in the world over an anonymous internet avatar. I have an idea, why don't you ask your Dr "friend" on the CGC boards their thoughts on HQC and IVM and report back here. Your understanding on these medications seems to be straight off the TV. I'd advise reading/watching some of the abundant information put out by leading scientists around the world, highlighting the decades old use of IVM, and HQC in virology. They didn't give IVM discoverer a Nobel prize for no reason. IVM is in the top 3 drugs used, safe, and effective in the world to date. |
|
