|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Mar 23, 2023 11:24:56 GMT -8
I have an idea, why don't you ask your Dr "friend" on the CGC boards their thoughts on HQC and IVM and report back here. I have several doctor friends on the boards but I'm not going to bother them with every question that enters my mind. Anybody with half a brain can see the conspiracy against early treatment and the push for a single, solution, pharmaceutical treatment that was forced on the masses AGAINST THE SCIENCE Hey, at least you're partly right. There IS a conspiracy, just not the one you think it is. You admit you were wrong about your stance on childhood vaccinations, that you had received some "bad info". Your track record isn't stellar. Logic award   |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Mar 23, 2023 11:29:06 GMT -8
I have several doctor friends on the boards but I'm not going to bother them with every question that enters my mind. Anybody with half a brain can see the conspiracy against early treatment and the push for a single, solution, pharmaceutical treatment that was forced on the masses AGAINST THE SCIENCE Hey, at least you're partly right. There IS a conspiracy, just not the one you think it is. You admit you were wrong about your stance on childhood vaccinations, that you had received some "bad info". Your track record isn't stellar. Logic award I don't understand your point. I made a post a decade ago about links between autism and vaccines based on a bad study. When the study was proven to be fraudulent I changed my position. The evidence is out that the vaccines are not as safe or as effective as we were told. Even major government agencies (Germany and Japan) are now admitting this. This is not a conspiracy theory. It's an outright conspiracy that happened, and you still haven't changed your stance putting you on the side of the conspiracy. Have you ever admitted you were wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 23, 2023 11:31:32 GMT -8
Hey, at least you're partly right. There IS a conspiracy, just not the one you think it is. You admit you were wrong about your stance on childhood vaccinations, that you had received some "bad info". Your track record isn't stellar. Logic award I don't understand your point. I made a post a decade ago about links between autism and vaccines based on a bad study. When the study was proven to be fraudulent I changed my position. The evidence is out that the vaccines are not as safe or as effective as we were told. Even major government agencies (Germany and Japan) are now admitting this. This is not a conspiracy theory. It's an outright conspiracy that happened, and you still haven't changed your stance putting you on the side of the conspiracy. Have you ever admitted you were wrong? Liberal: "You admitted you were wrong 10 years ago!!! Therefore youre wrong!!! Omg!!!" Libs never admit being wrong, ever. Anyone who can admit being wrong has credibility. This is what libs don't comprehend. |
|
|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Mar 23, 2023 12:22:56 GMT -8
Hey, at least you're partly right. There IS a conspiracy, just not the one you think it is. You admit you were wrong about your stance on childhood vaccinations, that you had received some "bad info". Your track record isn't stellar. Logic award I don't understand your point. I made a post a decade ago about links between autism and vaccines based on a bad study. When the study was proven to be fraudulent I changed my position. The evidence is out that the vaccines are not as safe or as effective as we were told. Even major government agencies (Germany and Japan) are now admitting this. This is not a conspiracy theory. It's an outright conspiracy that happened, and you still haven't changed your stance putting you on the side of the conspiracy. Have you ever admitted you were wrong? "Evidence" I guess google is in on the "conspiracy" as well because wen I google your claims no legitimate websites have any information that I can find. It's a conspiracy to keep the "real" information from us! If I buy you a Qanon t-shirt, will you wear it at a con? Serious offer. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 23, 2023 13:31:41 GMT -8
Controversial topic!
|
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Mar 23, 2023 14:38:20 GMT -8
Where the hell are my Snoopy slippers? I think the Asian chic hid them again. She does that to old white guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 23, 2023 15:22:11 GMT -8
Killed to death. damn. Not just you know-killed but he'll recover-  |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Mar 23, 2023 18:00:24 GMT -8
I don't understand your point. I made a post a decade ago about links between autism and vaccines based on a bad study. When the study was proven to be fraudulent I changed my position. The evidence is out that the vaccines are not as safe or as effective as we were told. Even major government agencies (Germany and Japan) are now admitting this. This is not a conspiracy theory. It's an outright conspiracy that happened, and you still haven't changed your stance putting you on the side of the conspiracy. Have you ever admitted you were wrong? "Evidence" I guess google is in on the "conspiracy" as well because wen I google your claims no legitimate websites have any information that I can find. It's a conspiracy to keep the "real" information from us! If I buy you a Qanon t-shirt, will you wear it at a con? Serious offer. Correct. According to Google / YouTube you are not allowed to state that the vaccines are unsafe. You will get demonetized and banned for saying it. But we now KNOW they are unsafe because Health Ministers from Governments are saying they are unsafe. So yes, Google is in on the conspiracy. Their algorithms will lower searches for such things that go against their TOS and bump up searches that support their TOS. Now you're getting it. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 23, 2023 18:02:51 GMT -8
"Evidence" I guess google is in on the "conspiracy" as well because wen I google your claims no legitimate websites have any information that I can find. It's a conspiracy to keep the "real" information from us! If I buy you a Qanon t-shirt, will you wear it at a con? Serious offer. Correct. According to Google / YouTube you are not allowed to state that the vaccines are unsafe. You will get demonetized and banned for saying it. But we now KNOW they are unsafe because Health Ministers from Governments are saying they are unsafe. So yes, Google is in on the conspiracy. Their algorithms will lower searches for such things that go against their TOS and bump up searches that support their TOS. Now you're getting it. Prepare yourself for one of these-most recently I received #2: Liberal debate strategies: 1 Keep changing the subject to avoid getting pinned down. 2 When cornered, insult your opponent 3 Paint them as the bad guys using words like hate, racist, phobic 4 Whatever you do, accuse them of doing-for example if you are a bigot who thinks black people are too simple minded to obtain IDs, accuse them of being bigots 5 Use the word conflate a lot 6 Use a lot of whataboutisms-if someone is talking about some democrat's actions, say WELL WHATABOUT TRUMP! 7 If its an in-person debate, interrupt your opponent constantly-do not let them speak as this will expose your position 8 Pretend you dont understand what the person is saying if they bring up damning points 9 If they mention a common disgusting tactic, talking point, or behavior of liberals, pretend like you've never heard of that 10 Cherry pick your data-like say WELL IN TWO OUT OF THE LAST TWO ELECTIONS, WE WON THE POPULAR VOTE!!! 11 Express hate for old white people as much as possible 12 Feel free to say anything disparaging of white people-this is the 'good' kind of racism 13 Simply despise older people in general 14 Twist and change the meaning of words to obfuscate 15 No matter what conservatives say and regardless of verifiable facts, accuse them of 'lying' 16 Use straw man as much as humanly possible 17 Use fear to push your agenda 18 Use the 'man didnt land on the moon' and 'flat earth' analogies to rebut science you do not agree with |
|
|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Mar 24, 2023 5:47:21 GMT -8
"Evidence" I guess google is in on the "conspiracy" as well because wen I google your claims no legitimate websites have any information that I can find. It's a conspiracy to keep the "real" information from us! If I buy you a Qanon t-shirt, will you wear it at a con? Serious offer. Correct. According to Google / YouTube you are not allowed to state that the vaccines are unsafe. You will get demonetized and banned for saying it. But we now KNOW they are unsafe because Health Ministers from Governments are saying they are unsafe. So yes, Google is in on the conspiracy. Their algorithms will lower searches for such things that go against their TOS and bump up searches that support their TOS. Now you're getting it.   |
|
|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Mar 24, 2023 5:54:41 GMT -8
I don't understand your point. I made a post a decade ago about links between autism and vaccines based on a bad study. When the study was proven to be fraudulent I changed my position. The evidence is out that the vaccines are not as safe or as effective as we were told. Even major government agencies (Germany and Japan) are now admitting this. This is not a conspiracy theory. It's an outright conspiracy that happened, and you still haven't changed your stance putting you on the side of the conspiracy. Have you ever admitted you were wrong? Liberal: "You admitted you were wrong 10 years ago!!! Therefore youre wrong!!! Omg!!!" Libs never admit being wrong, ever. Anyone who can admit being wrong has credibility. This is what libs don't comprehend. Yes, you have it 100% right. Why show examples of past behavior, no way that could show a pattern of thought right? I have a hard time believing you're that hyperbolic that you honestly believe "Libs never admit to being wrong". That's like me saying all Regressives are fascist, racist, democracy hating insurrectionists, when it's only really about 30% of them. |
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Mar 24, 2023 7:04:09 GMT -8
I heard some guy the other day tell another guy "How dare you say you are not White! I saw your picture"!
WACIST!!!!
Guess the guy was just pointing out the other guy had a wacist pattern.
|
|
|
|
Post by quantumcomics on Mar 24, 2023 7:17:57 GMT -8
I heard some guy the other day tell another guy "How dare you say you are not White! I saw your picture"! WACIST!!!! Guess the guy was just pointing out the other guy had a wacist pattern. Deflect and project, the conservative way. Better to focus on this as opposed to the actual point that was being made. Sad. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 24, 2023 10:12:15 GMT -8
Liberal: "You admitted you were wrong 10 years ago!!! Therefore youre wrong!!! Omg!!!" Libs never admit being wrong, ever. Anyone who can admit being wrong has credibility. This is what libs don't comprehend. Yes, you have it 100% right. Why show examples of past behavior, no way that could show a pattern of thought right? I have a hard time believing you're that hyperbolic that you honestly believe "Libs never admit to being wrong". That's like me saying all Regressives are fascist, racist, democracy hating insurrectionists, when it's only really about 30% of them. admitting being wrong 10 years ago is now a 'pattern of behavior' I guess vintagecomics  Let me rephrase-I have been arguing with liberals for 30 years online and in person-not once has a single liberal ever admitted being wrong ever. I have, and so have conservatives like vintage. Libs-nope. So if it makes you feel more safe I will say I have never ever witnessed a lib admitting being wrong despite thousands of encounters rather than a blanket statement that 'libs never admit being wrong' (altho I suspect strongly this is true to a small margin of error). Oh you liberals |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 24, 2023 10:13:44 GMT -8
I heard some guy the other day tell another guy "How dare you say you are not White! I saw your picture"! WACIST!!!! Guess the guy was just pointing out the other guy had a wacist pattern. Deflect and project, the conservative way. Better to focus on this as opposed to the actual point that was being made. Sad. #4 |
|
