|
Post by kav on Mar 4, 2023 15:07:20 GMT -8
Libs have decent ideas but terrible execution of those ideas. Do you know why? Apparently, psychologically, Liberals more often tend to be people who are more agreeable and less organized. They're often humanities and arts students. The dreamers. And while they come up with many ideas, the execution of them is different than conservatives who tend to think things through more. Conservatives are apparently more structured and organized. So they attack and execute ideas very differently. The pandemic is proof. It was a total disaster wherever it was handled by Liberals. It's like they didn't even try to mitigate it. All they tried to do was look good while doing it. It would be really great if both sides could use each other's strengths rather than prey on each other's weaknesses. The urge to control others is the heart of liberalism. And this comes from being out of control of one's own life and emotions. Thus it is projected outwards. Conservatives on the other hand believe in leaving others alone as much as possible. Because their lives and emotions are stable.
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 4, 2023 15:08:57 GMT -8
Here's wut it looks like:
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 4, 2023 15:14:38 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Mar 4, 2023 15:49:27 GMT -8
Apparently, psychologically, Liberals more often tend to be people who are more agreeable and less organized. They're often humanities and arts students. The dreamers. And while they come up with many ideas, the execution of them is different than conservatives who tend to think things through more. Conservatives are apparently more structured and organized. So they attack and execute ideas very differently. The pandemic is proof. It was a total disaster wherever it was handled by Liberals. It's like they didn't even try to mitigate it. All they tried to do was look good while doing it. It would be really great if both sides could use each other's strengths rather than prey on each other's weaknesses. The urge to control others is the heart of liberalism. And this comes from being out of control of one's own life and emotions. Thus it is projected outwards. Conservatives on the other hand believe in leaving others alone as much as possible. Because their lives and emotions are stable. Very true. Another thing I've realized is that Conservatives often sat quietly and just ignore stupidity. They don't try to prove anything. Liberals scream out loud and protest everything. The point I'm making is that the public perception is often swayed by majority and the Liberals know this. So they don't control with reason or logic. They control with power. With PERCEPTION...while conservatives don't care about perception. This is why they use cancel culture. By erasing history, erasing dissenting voices, erasing any opposition they control the public narrative. But this is changing. Just as the Liberal ideology has changed from being a "peace loving party" to the "war machine party" through greed and corruption, Conservatives are realizing they need to be more vocal. More structured and unified. We are seeing alliances form between people on the conservative side that wouldn't have formed otherwise. For example, Jordan Peterson is spearheading this: News Jordan Peterson Announces World Economic Forum AlternativeProfessor of psychology and public speaker Jordan Peterson has announced the formation of an international consortium that would serve as a kind of populist alternative to the elitist World Economic Forum (WEF) and provide a countervailing force against globalist aims and narratives. Peterson laid out his plan in an appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast, telling him that an inaugural event of the group is being planned for the cusp of October/November 2023 in London. Around 2,000 business, cultural, and political figures will be invited to take part in the consortium, he said, adding that he wants the discussions open to the public and membership in the organization to be as broad as possible. That would put participation at a similar scale to the WEF’s recent meeting in Davos, Switzerland, which amassed around 2,700 international leaders, Wall Street executives, central bankers, and celebrities.
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 4, 2023 16:03:50 GMT -8
Since they are in control of the media they get to depict Republicans as racists. The party of Lincoln-the party that had never been racist-that was them Democrats and Dixiecrats and KKK and what not-suddenly in the 60s movies and TV shows like all in the family began depicting republicans as the racist party-and the goofballs swallowed it. The party that believes blacks are too simple minded to obtain IDs and need constant mulligans to get along in society says that republicans are racist! Its unbelievable.
|
|
|
Post by jcjames on Mar 4, 2023 17:18:04 GMT -8
Classical Marxism succeeded in fanning the flames of envy, jealousy, wrath and revenge where there were permanent economic classes in societies. In European societies, still exuding odors of the Aristocracies and Monarchies, where Lords and Ladies and members of the upper class and lower class were permanently affixed in their stations in life, the sweet-tasting social poison of Marxism and Leninism easily took root.
However, in America, there were very few places where "the rich" had always been rich and "the poor" were always going to be poor. There was far more fluidity between lower and upper (and middle) economic classes. The Land of Opportunity, which had little history of perpetually-rich and powerful families, was a fertile place for the hard-working poor (including millions of immigrants) to raise their status, build their family businesses and economically succeed whereas there was still just mostly economic stagnation back in the "old country". While not perfect, America was the best there was at allowing the poor to become noticeably better-off than their parents, something almost unheard of for centuries back in the old countries.
Thus, classical Marxism could barely eke out many followers with their classical "class-struggle/workers-of-the world-unite" blathering. Americans who were poor yet growing more secure economically through their own efforts and merit had no need for the loud-shouting Marxists and Communists to wage their phony "revolution" here in America. So what's an itchy Marxist to do if they couldn't divide Americans by class in order to wage their class-war purely for the benefit of the Marxist's own self-serving struggle for autocratic power?
Divide Americans by color. Colors/races in America became the inescapable "classes" that could be used to stir up perpetual antagonism, envy, wrath and revenge. Again, all to benefit the Marxist's own self-serving struggle for THEIR autocratic power over the perpetually race-warring factions of Americans that THEY ignited and threw the gasoline on.
So here we are. Wondering if it's okay to be white.
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 4, 2023 17:23:54 GMT -8
Classical Marxism succeeded in fanning the flames of envy, jealousy, wrath and revenge where there were permanent economic classes in societies. In European societies, still exuding odors of the Aristocracies and Monarchies, where Lords and Ladies and members of the upper class and lower class were permanently affixed in their stations in life, the sweet-tasting social poison of Marxism and Leninism easily took root. However, in America, there were very few places where "the rich" had always been rich and "the poor" were always going to be poor. There was far more fluidity between lower and upper (and middle) economic classes. The Land of Opportunity, which had little history of perpetually-rich and powerful families, was a fertile place for the hard-working poor (including millions of immigrants) to raise their status, build their family businesses and economically succeed whereas there was still just mostly economic stagnation back in the "old country". While not perfect, America was the best there was at allowing the poor to become noticeably better-off than their parents, something almost unheard of for centuries back in the old countries. Thus, classical Marxism could barely eek out many followers with their classical "class-struggle/workers-of-the world-unite" blathering. Americans who were poor yet growing more secure economically through their own efforts and merit had no need for the loud-shouting Marxists and Communists to wage their phony "revolution" here in America. So what's an itchy Marxist to do if they couldn't divide Americans by class in order to wage their class-war purely for the benefit of the Marxist's own self-serving struggle for autocratic power? Divide Americans by color. Colors/races in America became the inescapable "classes" that could be used to stir up antagonism, envy, wrath and revenge. Again, all to benefit the Marxist's own self-serving struggle for THEIR autocratic power over the perpetually race-warring factions of Americans that THEY ignited and threw the gasoline on. So here we are. Wondering if it's okay to be white. Yep. Ps "eke".
|
|
|
Post by jcjames on Mar 4, 2023 17:27:38 GMT -8
Classical Marxism succeeded in fanning the flames of envy, jealousy, wrath and revenge where there were permanent economic classes in societies. In European societies, still exuding odors of the Aristocracies and Monarchies, where Lords and Ladies and members of the upper class and lower class were permanently affixed in their stations in life, the sweet-tasting social poison of Marxism and Leninism easily took root. However, in America, there were very few places where "the rich" had always been rich and "the poor" were always going to be poor. There was far more fluidity between lower and upper (and middle) economic classes. The Land of Opportunity, which had little history of perpetually-rich and powerful families, was a fertile place for the hard-working poor (including millions of immigrants) to raise their status, build their family businesses and economically succeed whereas there was still just mostly economic stagnation back in the "old country". While not perfect, America was the best there was at allowing the poor to become noticeably better-off than their parents, something almost unheard of for centuries back in the old countries. Thus, classical Marxism could barely eek out many followers with their classical "class-struggle/workers-of-the world-unite" blathering. Americans who were poor yet growing more secure economically through their own efforts and merit had no need for the loud-shouting Marxists and Communists to wage their phony "revolution" here in America. So what's an itchy Marxist to do if they couldn't divide Americans by class in order to wage their class-war purely for the benefit of the Marxist's own self-serving struggle for autocratic power? Divide Americans by color. Colors/races in America became the inescapable "classes" that could be used to stir up antagonism, envy, wrath and revenge. Again, all to benefit the Marxist's own self-serving struggle for THEIR autocratic power over the perpetually race-warring factions of Americans that THEY ignited and threw the gasoline on. So here we are. Wondering if it's okay to be white. Yep. Ps "eke". EEK!!!
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 4, 2023 17:29:07 GMT -8
EEK!!! He must have just spotted a lib.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Mar 4, 2023 18:52:02 GMT -8
Since they are in control of the media they get to depict Republicans as racists. The party of Lincoln-the party that had never been racist-that was them Democrats and Dixiecrats and KKK and what not-suddenly in the 60s movies and TV shows like all in the family began depicting republicans as the racist party-and the goofballs swallowed it. The party that believes blacks are too simple minded to obtain IDs and need constant mulligans to get along in society says that republicans are racist! Its unbelievable. How about the fact that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden are so dumb and unintelligent sounding that my kids speak better. Now they want you to believe these two sock puppets are running anything. Meanwhile, they can't even tie their own shoelaces. These sorts of lies are destroying the fabric of society...the very structure that has held it together for millenia.
|
|
|
Post by kav on Mar 4, 2023 18:53:30 GMT -8
Since they are in control of the media they get to depict Republicans as racists. The party of Lincoln-the party that had never been racist-that was them Democrats and Dixiecrats and KKK and what not-suddenly in the 60s movies and TV shows like all in the family began depicting republicans as the racist party-and the goofballs swallowed it. The party that believes blacks are too simple minded to obtain IDs and need constant mulligans to get along in society says that republicans are racist! Its unbelievable. How about the fact that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden are so dumb and unintelligent sounding that my kids speak better. Now they want you to believe these two sock puppets are running anything. Meanwhile, they can't even tie their own shoelaces. These sorts of lies are destroying the fabric of society...the very structure that has held it together for millenia. Ask any lib and they will gush about how smart those 2 are. Remember the lib dictionary: Smart-someone who agrees with me.
|
|