|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Sept 10, 2023 18:36:54 GMT -8
This is yet ANOTHER monster news headline that 50 years ago would have made headlines across the country.
The President of the United States of America, a country which USED TO BE THE BASTION OF FREE SPEECH 'likely violated the 1st Amendment' suppressing Free Speech and coerced the public says the appeals court as the White House seeks to appeal an injunction against them, preventing them from interacting with social media.
Duh.
Even left wing media, Biden's personal propaganda channels are now reporting on it, albeit if you read their headlines they are twisting the judgment to soften the blow.
But the truth continues to get out.
Folks, when the ruler of the free world violates free speech laws, it's not only bad for the US it's bad for the entire democratic world, because as the US goes so goes everyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Sept 11, 2023 16:23:58 GMT -8
And THE SAME BATTLE IS GOING ON IN CANADIAN COURTS AS WE SPEAK.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Sept 11, 2023 16:28:47 GMT -8
The Canadian Government tried to block Rebel News, an independent news site that DOESN'T TAKE GOVERNMENT MONEY from seeing the Government's posts on Twitter. Can you effing imagine that?  The Government wanted to sensor Rebel News from seeing Government PUBLIC POSTS ON Twitter because they couldn't control what Rebel News were saying. Rebel News not only won, they had to pay court costs. Folks, this is no longer a democratic Canadian Government directive. These people are pushing something that is not democratic and are trying to silence anyone who tries to disagree with them in an undemocratic manner. Which is why they shut down the Trucker Protest. It had NOTHING to do with anything else. These are terrifying times. It's like watching communism / fascism unfold before your eyes right out of the center of the most democratic countries in the world. Unreal. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jan 6, 2024 9:12:34 GMT -8
Missouri AG Andrew Bailey: The Supreme Court must protect free speech | Opinion
In a free society, the debate between opposing viewpoints should be played out in the marketplace of ideas. Enshrined in the First Amendment, our right to free speech is the bedrock of our great nation. Unfortunately, free speech is under attack by the very people sworn to protect it: government officials. In October, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear our bombshell censorship case, Missouri v. Biden, in which we alleged — and proved — a conspiracy by government officials to silence conservative speech on social media. In partnership with Louisiana, my office filed suit to combat the Biden administration’s censorship of speech that challenged the government’s narrative on everything from the COVID–19 lab leak theory, to the Hunter Biden laptop story. The Biden administration’s censorship campaign was unsparing. Left-leaning federal bureaucrats used both direct and implied threats to distort public debate on key issues over the course of several years. We sued to stop it, and thankfully, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. The vast censorship enterprise uncovered in Missouri v. Biden is highly disturbing. What’s worse is it’s not the only example. The Supreme Court has agreed to review yet another case involving government censorship against political opponents: NRA v. Vullo. Vullo goes back to 2017, when then-New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo hatched a plot to destroy the National Rifle Association and its ability to advocate for gun rights. Working with Maria Vullo, then head of New York’s Department of Financial Services, New York initiated a campaign of public warnings and backroom threats to financial institutions designed to hamper the NRA’s ability to function. Their message: Drop the NRA, or face regulatory reprisals.
|
|
