Coronavirus (COVID-19)

The Government meanwhile, CONTINUES TO TRY TO ARGUE THAT THE CASE IS MOOT IN HIGHER COURTS IN AN EFFORT TO BLOCK IT.

Wonder why? 

CCF in court this week seeking declaration of rights violation in vaccine passport case

TORONTO – The Canadian Constitution Foundation will be in court October 4, 5 and 6, 2023, in the appeal of their legal challenge to the British Columbia vaccine passports. The B.C. Court of Appeal is hearing the appeal in Kassian v British Columbia. The case was dismissed by the B.C. Supreme Court on the grounds that the court said the case was premature.

The CCF brought this case with two women and one girl, who were seeking good faith medical exemptions. Two of the petitioners working with the CCF had received a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine to which they suffered severe adverse reactions, and the third had been disabled since birth, was extremely medically complex, had undergone 15 surgeries, and had a history of adverse drug reactions.

“The government has attempted to evade constitutional scrutiny of their vaccine passport regime by claiming that our applicants’ cases were premature. But the three women in this case were ineligible to even apply for a blanket medical exemption on the face of the law. The B.C. government used a ‘closed list’ system for exemptions. Only people with specific medical conditions were permitted to even apply for an exemption,” said CCF Litigation Director, Christine Van Geyn. “Even if a patient had one of those conditions on the mandatory BC government form, those patients would only be potentially eligible for an ‘activity by activity’ exemption. This meant the patient would need to apply to the government every single time she wanted to do some basic socializing in a public place.”

The case was dismissed as premature at the lower level because the government admitting that they were issuing medical exemptions outside that “closed list.” “B.C. used a secret and unknowable process in an attempt to remedy a constitutionally deficient law. This cannot be permitted to stand,” continued Van Geyn.

“The women and the girl in this case, citizens who could not obtain good faith medical exemptions in B.C. will now have their day in court,” said CCF Litigation Director, Christine Van Geyn. “We are seeking a declaration that these petitioners and those like them had their rights violated by this discriminatory policy”.

The government is also attempting to prevent the appeal from proceeding by arguing that the case is now moot. “The government has thrown up yet another procedural roadblock to stop the women in this case from achieving justice – they are claiming that the case is moot. The government had already unsuccessfully argued that the case was moot at the lower level, and they are now attempting to re-litigate that position.” Said Van Geyn. “The simple fact is the case is not moot. Furthermore, the B.C. government has refused to commit that it will not bring back some form of vaccine passport. As we enter the season for fall respiratory viruses, this is a very real prospect,” cautioned Van Geyn.

The US is particularly interesting to watch because compared to Canada they're a republic and so a very different legal system. 

They seem to get more varied results in the US compared to Canada. 

In Canada, there is talk of the Supreme Court being capture by the Liberal Government, which has literally been throwing out ALL law suits against the Federal Government over pandemic mandates. 

Dr. Byram Bridle is a Virologist and Vaccinologist at University of Guelph.

I know it's not a University of Pennsylvania degree, but come on. Give the guy a chance! 



Dr. Byram Bridle unveils recent discoveries of DNA contamination present in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. He suggests that this revelation could serve as compelling evidence to pursue legal action against the manufacturers.

Dr. Byram Bridle joined the World Council for Health to explain new findings of DNA contamination in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. While some of Dr. Byram's explanations about the contamination may pose a challenge for the average person to understand, the essence of his message is clear: the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are contaminated.

Towards the end of the video, starting at the 15:39:30 mark, Dr. Bridle explains how attorneys could leverage this discovery to pursue legal action against manufacturers. Importantly, Dr. Byram highlights that this DNA contaminant was not disclosed by the manufacturers during the authorization process.

You can watch the entire council meeting at the link below.

rumble.com/v3osyg4-urgent-expert-hearing-on-reports-of-dna-contamination-in-mrna-vaccines-edit.html

A Freedom of Information Act inquiry in Canada about how many people registered with adverse events from Covid vaccines is delayed because the document is large and may contain 10,000's of pages according to a Canadian Government document. 

So, the vaccines never were as safe or effective as advertised...

But Tony Blair at the World Economic Forum states we need Digital ID and digital infrastructure because “you need to know who’s been vaccinated and who hasn’t been vaccinated”

That's not terrifying. 

From NY State THIS WEEK - This is not from 2020. 


Senator Walczyk Denounces Court Decision To Reinstate Quarantine Regulations

An appellate court in the State of New York has ruled to reinstate regulations that give authority to the NYS Department of Health, under the purview of the Governor, to issue quarantines during infectious disease outbreaks. The ruling of the 4th Judicial Department overturns a decision by a State Supreme Court Justice, who found clear violations in the constitutional requirements for a separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches.



"The idea that the State Health Department will lawfully quarantine a New Yorker against their will sounds Soviet," Walczyk said. "The Judiciary has a role to play in checking the Executive and I'm deeply disappointed the Appellate Division missed the opportunity to draw the line at tyranny," Walczyk said. "Governor Hochul is falling right behind Cuomo in a lust for power of the state over individual rights. We'll continue to fight until we win back a future for New Yorkers that includes freedom."