Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2019 20:29:35 GMT -8
Image Comics has been around now for over 27 years. That puts them on par with some of the longest lasting publishers in existence. In fact, only Dark Horse, DC, Marvel, Archie, Harvey, Charlton, and Western/Dell can claim to have been around for a longer period of time.
In that time, Image has grown from the "hot artist" publisher of the early 90s, to the publisher willing to publish virtually anything, from westerns to "romance" to superhero to supernatural to sci-fi, always remaining creator-owned.
As the era of print possibly begins to wind down, what will the future of Image be? While it has its "hits" like Saga, Walking Dead, and Spawn, it's mostly a 5-10% of the market company, and hasn't had a major new hit in well over half a decade.
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on Sept 17, 2019 21:40:59 GMT -8
Image having a 5-10% market share obviously works for them/their business model, but if/when print comics further phase out I wouldn't expect companies outside of DC, Marvel, and possibly Archie to maintain or even grow readership. I think it's much easier to follow one publisher's titles when the majority share the same "universe" and have characters that have lengthy, varied, and intertwined history with other characters under the same imprint. Just speaking for myself, I'm more inclined to try out a new title if it features a familiar character, favorite writer or artist,etc. more so than something completely new unless I'm hearing positive reviews or intrigued by the theme of the book. When the time comes that books are primarily distributed online I expect I'll have the same habits unless the price structure for reading new (or old) titles is such that I would be reading books at a much lower cost.
While I do like the variety that Image is willing to publish, I notice that I still often spend my dollar on a familiar property before I pick up a random new title. I also tend to wait on tpb's from publishers like Boom or Dynamite rather than bother with the individual issues, so I'm not supporting a title until it's already established in many cases. I think I also carry the baggage that comes with being an older reader who was primarily interested in the titles from the "Big 2", and very much enjoys holding an actual comic and flipping through it's pages over the online experience, so I'm thinking a company with a larger back catalog will find greater success. I'm not sure Image has that.
|
|