|
|
Post by steveinthecity on May 3, 2017 19:06:20 GMT -8
Pardons, Captain America #175  |
|
slym2none
TCBF Member
Joined: December 2016
Posts: 3,540
|
Post by slym2none on May 3, 2017 19:09:03 GMT -8
I had just read the Essential CA volume with that storyline in it not long ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on May 3, 2017 19:54:10 GMT -8
I had just read the Essential CA volume with that storyline in it not long ago. I thought the Engelhart Cap was a good read all the way through the Kirby issues. |
|
slym2none
TCBF Member
Joined: December 2016
Posts: 3,540
|
Post by slym2none on May 3, 2017 19:57:17 GMT -8
That whole era was full of fun reads. Not all good, but fun!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeffro on May 4, 2017 5:53:46 GMT -8
I had just read the Essential CA volume with that storyline in it not long ago. I thought the Engelhart Cap was a good read all the way through the Kirby issues. I'm one issue away (143) from a reader run of every Cap between 137 and 182. I refuse to collect the issues between that and when Kirby started his run. The reason? Frank Robbins  |
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on May 4, 2017 5:59:15 GMT -8
I thought the Engelhart Cap was a good read all the way through the Kirby issues. I'm one issue away (143) from a reader run of every Cap between 137 and 182. I refuse to collect the issues between that and when Kirby started his run. The reason? Frank Robbins I'm very much a story over art guy, but Yeah, Frank Robbins can be tough. I always think of how Invaders suffered a bit from his artwork. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeffro on May 4, 2017 6:01:40 GMT -8
I'm one issue away (143) from a reader run of every Cap between 137 and 182. I refuse to collect the issues between that and when Kirby started his run. The reason? Frank Robbins I'm very much a story over art guy, but Yeah, Frank Robbins can be tough. I always think of how Invaders suffered a bit from his artwork. I agree about story but a guy like Robbins just kills it for me. It may not be unreadable, but it is unenjoyable |
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on May 8, 2017 17:01:05 GMT -8
Okay...here's one.
What is this and what is its significance? |
|
|
|
Post by Siggy's Tar Dust® on May 8, 2017 17:15:03 GMT -8
The mis-colored FF comic?
|
|
|
|
Post by Siggy's Tar Dust® on May 8, 2017 17:17:53 GMT -8
Wait, that doesn't work
|
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on May 9, 2017 11:34:58 GMT -8
Was this drawn the day Goodman terminated Joe Maneely?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on May 9, 2017 14:55:10 GMT -8
Was this drawn the day Goodman terminated Joe Maneely? After. Hint: That's a drawing of Stan Lee standing on the chair. |
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on May 9, 2017 15:55:41 GMT -8
Was this drawn the day Goodman terminated Joe Maneely? After. Hint: That's a drawing of Stan Lee standing on the chair. Were they trying to save money and drop Stan Goldberg from the regular bullpen staff and now Stan lee was going to color the books?  This is tough. I don't know much about Joe Maneely. |
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on May 9, 2017 16:05:43 GMT -8
After. Hint: That's a drawing of Stan Lee standing on the chair. Were they trying to save money and drop Stan Goldberg from the regular bullpen staff and now Stan lee was going to color the books? This is tough. I don't know much about Joe Maneely. I'll just post the link. It does a better job of telling the story than I could. As close as they were, I think if Joe hadn't been killed a month later, the future would probably have been different - especially regarding Ditko and Kirby. Stan's First Team-Up: Stan Lee and Artist Joe Maneely |
|
|
|
Post by Jeffro on May 15, 2017 9:38:53 GMT -8
Possibly but Maneely couldn't have drawn it all himself. Stan would still have needed more artists.
|
|
This is tough. I don't know much about Joe Maneely.
