|
Post by quantumcomics on Dec 15, 2023 13:39:14 GMT -8
He needs somewhere to spew his garbage and he can't do it on the CGC forums which is where he really wants to post it. I don't get why he doesn't just post it to Facebook where all his "friends" that he says agree he's right are located and they can just have a huge circle jerk.
|
|
|
Post by kav on Dec 15, 2023 13:47:50 GMT -8
He needs somewhere to spew his garbage and he can't do it on the CGC forums which is where he really wants to post it. I don't get why he doesn't just post it to Facebook where all his "friends" that he says agree he's right are located and they can just have a huge circle jerk. I mean really-its BIZARRE.
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Dec 15, 2023 19:38:27 GMT -8
"Representative Stefanik pushed the three Presidents hard, each in turn, requesting at least by implication an affirmative response to “the easiest question to answer”: “Does calling specifically for the genocide of Jews violate [your university’s] code of conduct or rules regarding bullying and harassment?” To understand what happened next, in all three cases, it is necessary to understand that these selfsame codes and rules have been a veritable shibboleth of the moralizing activists the three Presidents concerned so directly condone, support and produce. For years, a continuous clamor has arisen from the snowflakes, allies, Marxists, post-modernists and generally psychopathological neurotics concerning the absolute danger of speech that could in any way imaginable cause offence to anyone imaginable under any circumstances whatsoever.
But now, suddenly, this insistence—one that has already destroyed the careers and even the lives of far more than a few—appears to be fully disposable, as long as the speech in question is calling directly and viciously for the genocide of the Jews."The Jews Today And You Tomorrow
|
|
|
Post by Prince Namor on Dec 15, 2023 20:22:29 GMT -8
"Representative Stefanik pushed the three Presidents hard, each in turn, requesting at least by implication an affirmative response to “the easiest question to answer”: “Does calling specifically for the genocide of Jews violate [your university’s] code of conduct or rules regarding bullying and harassment?” To understand what happened next, in all three cases, it is necessary to understand that these selfsame codes and rules have been a veritable shibboleth of the moralizing activists the three Presidents concerned so directly condone, support and produce. For years, a continuous clamor has arisen from the snowflakes, allies, Marxists, post-modernists and generally psychopathological neurotics concerning the absolute danger of speech that could in any way imaginable cause offence to anyone imaginable under any circumstances whatsoever.
But now, suddenly, this insistence—one that has already destroyed the careers and even the lives of far more than a few—appears to be fully disposable, as long as the speech in question is calling directly and viciously for the genocide of the Jews."The Jews Today And You Tomorrow Which way to go: "Is the calling for the genocide of Jews against university policy?" No. Anti-semite! You support Hamas! You're corrupting our children! You're destroying our educational system! OR: "Is the calling for the genocide of Jews against university policy?" Yes. Censorship! You're killing babies in Palestine! You're corrupting our children! You're destroying our educational system! Ah yes. Jordan Petersen longs for the good old days of Harvard when date rape was overlooked, you could still discriminate against gay people and blacks only made up 5% of the students.
|
|
|
Post by kav on Dec 15, 2023 20:32:26 GMT -8
You're a bad actor
|
|
Cat
TCBF Member
Joined: October 2022
Posts: 238
|
Post by Cat on Dec 16, 2023 10:29:25 GMT -8
You're a bad actor If he'd say those to things to them in person the he's a bully, if not he's a victim.
|
|
|
Post by kav on Dec 16, 2023 11:52:27 GMT -8
You're a bad actor If he'd say those to things to them in person the he's a bully, if not he's a victim.
|
|