|
|
Post by barry on Sept 23, 2022 2:45:08 GMT -8
PETA Demands Meat Eaters Be Banned From Having Sex
They also called on women to go on a sex strike to save the world, citing research saying that men cause 41 times more greenhouse gas emissions than women because they eat more meat.
|
|
|
|
Post by kav on Sept 23, 2022 6:47:28 GMT -8
PETA Demands Meat Eaters Be Banned From Having SexThey also called on women to go on a sex strike to save the world, citing research saying that men cause 41 times more greenhouse gas emissions than women because they eat more meat. I know for a fact men can sex strike longer than women. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Sept 23, 2022 12:14:27 GMT -8
PETA Demands Meat Eaters Be Banned From Having SexThey also called on women to go on a sex strike to save the world, citing research saying that men cause 41 times more greenhouse gas emissions than women because they eat more meat. Hitler turned Germany into followers by convincing the Germans that certain humans were the problem to disease and needed to be dealt with. The Nazi movement? The Holocaust? The conquering of Europe? It all started with Hitler's obsession with germs and conquering the unclean through 'science'. True story. He fed his armies speed and cocaine to give them edge, because science said it was good. Another truth. This is just history repeating itself. It's Marxist ideology being purveyed through political beliefs. |
|
|
|
Post by barry on Sept 24, 2022 6:14:15 GMT -8
Trump-appointed World Bank president under fire for climate change waffling The Biden administration is reportedly considering replacing World Bank President David Malpass, who was appointed by President Donald Trump in 2019, for his reluctance to accept the science of climate change, but Malpass said he won’t resign, setting up a potential showdown over control of the international lending institution.
|
|
|
|
Post by barry on Sept 25, 2022 4:15:02 GMT -8
Leading Climate Scientist Says IPCC’s Talking Points Increasingly Implausible A prominent climate scientist has warned that the picture of climate change presented in the IPCC’s narrative is simplistic, ill-conceived, and undermined by observational evidence. In a new discussion paper, Professor Richard Lindzen of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) points out that the official picture, focusing narrowly on carbon dioxide as a warming agent, becomes implausible when applied to the details of the climate system.According to Lindzen: “If you are going to blame everything on carbon dioxide, you have to explain why, on all timescales, temperatures in the tropics are extremely stable while those in high latitudes are much more variable. “The IPCC’s story is that small amounts of greenhouse warming near the equator are ‘amplified’ at high latitudes. But neither theory nor data support the idea of amplification.” Instead, says Lindzen, this pattern – of stable tropical temperatures and fluctuating ones in high latitudes – is mostly a function of natural processes in the atmosphere and oceans; in other words, changes in oceanic and atmospheric currents that transport heat poleward while drawing varying amounts of heat out of the tropics. These changes in transport affect the tropics, but they are not determined by the tropics. “The changes in the Earth’s so-called temperature are mainly due to changes in the temperature difference between the tropics and the poles – at least for major changes. “The changes in tropical temperature, which are influenced by greenhouse processes, are a minor contribution.” Richard Lindzen: An assessment of the conventional global warming narrative (pdf)
|
|
|
|
Post by barry on Sept 25, 2022 4:23:12 GMT -8
Wimps: WashPost Urges Colleges to Provide Counseling Over 'Climate Anxiety' College campuses are now wasting money to validate feelings of anxiety over climate change. You can insert your own "snowflake" punchline, but this is not a joke. On September 12, The Washington Post highlighted the “critical” need for what it called “climate stress counseling services” at universities across the country. “It was hard to feel as though there was a ‘level of understanding of how dire the situation is,’” one student told the Post. Oh Lord, here come the sob stories. Eco-anxiety is commonly used to describe people’s concerns about climate change, but psychologists say it is better to use more general terms such as 'climate stress' and 'climate distress' — terms that encompass the array of feelings someone may have in response to climate change,” according to The Post. You’ve got to be kidding me. The Post indicated that these “counseling services” are to “validate” students feelings of helplessness and anxiety over climate change. So yes, that means that tax-payer money that goes into public universities is paying for students to have their feelings over climate change “validated.” What the frick is happening to our society!? More lunacy indicated that these university support groups needed places to “manage despair and grief related to the future of the planet.” At meetings, participants would choose an object in nature they resonate with — including leaves, flowers, twigs, stones, shells — sparking conversation and allowing students to connect to each other’s experiences. To take it a step further, the Post indicated that “experts” suggested that counselors seek special training to help people with “eco-anxiety” as it takes a special type of psycho to think that people need therapy over climate change. Here's what I expect these support groups to look like: The Washington Post not only published this dumb story to its website but even spent money printing it out for the September 16 edition of the paper. Sure, the climate may be experiencing some changes but dwelling on it and having “support groups” to talk about twigs, flowers and stones is not going to do anything except validate stupid feelings.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Sept 25, 2022 6:43:53 GMT -8
Leading Climate Scientist Says IPCC’s Talking Points Increasingly ImplausibleA prominent climate scientist has warned that the picture of climate change presented in the IPCC’s narrative is simplistic, ill-conceived, and undermined by observational evidence. In a new discussion paper, Professor Richard Lindzen of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) points out that the official picture, focusing narrowly on carbon dioxide as a warming agent, becomes implausible when applied to the details of the climate system.According to Lindzen: “If you are going to blame everything on carbon dioxide, you have to explain why, on all timescales, temperatures in the tropics are extremely stable while those in high latitudes are much more variable. “The IPCC’s story is that small amounts of greenhouse warming near the equator are ‘amplified’ at high latitudes. But neither theory nor data support the idea of amplification.” Instead, says Lindzen, this pattern – of stable tropical temperatures and fluctuating ones in high latitudes – is mostly a function of natural processes in the atmosphere and oceans; in other words, changes in oceanic and atmospheric currents that transport heat poleward while drawing varying amounts of heat out of the tropics. These changes in transport affect the tropics, but they are not determined by the tropics. “The changes in the Earth’s so-called temperature are mainly due to changes in the temperature difference between the tropics and the poles – at least for major changes. “The changes in tropical temperature, which are influenced by greenhouse processes, are a minor contribution.” Richard Lindzen: An assessment of the conventional global warming narrative (pdf) In every 'crisis' that is manufactured, there is one problem sitting at the top of the pyramid that the world is told needs to stop and address. During the pandemic, it was SARS-Cov-2 which we were told was going to kill so many people. Well, it did but not the people we were told it was going to kill. Instead the government used the opportunity to change the world by locking it down and pushing through undemocratic, tyrannical measures and change the fabric of society. The virus must be stopped at all costs. For Climate change, it's carbon. Guess what they're trying to do? Push through undemocratic tyrannical measures and change the fabric of society. Only the 'problem' is not as acute as the virus was so they're having a much tougher time ruling through fear like they did during the pandemic. Global Warming must be stopped at all costs. In politics, it's Trump. He's the problem. The virus. The disease. He must be stopped at all costs. In every aspect of society, ANY facet of existence that leads towards freedom of choice and individual autonomy is being opposed and changed. And on every level, it's being accomplished through individual people like CGC board members who are ratting individuals out, opposing or attacking them publicly or silencing the discussion. And every time they are found wrong, like when we realized that the virus was only killing old or sick people, or with global warming when cities don't end up under water as predicted, or Trump isn't impeached as expected, they come out with a new angle, a new fear or a new fact given them open license to subjugate people and renew the attack. Guess which side of the crisis each political group is on EVERY time?  It's now so apparent it's utterly, ridiculously obvious. And the ones complying and supporting these people are the problem. Who buy into the drama, who encroach on the will of individuals who just want to live their lives in peach, who impose their ideology on anyone who won't agree with them. Ironically, as was stated in the other CGC board discussion thread, the religion thread goes untouched by these people. Why? Because it doesn't go against the religion of those trying to impose their will on everyone. At least not yet. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Sept 25, 2022 12:48:37 GMT -8
"Too few individuals, and a people reverts to a mob"
-Stilgar
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Sept 25, 2022 13:15:42 GMT -8
"Too few individuals, and a people reverts to a mob" -Stilgar This is the main principle behind identity politics, which is what "woke" and Liberal politics are currently based on. Form the group under an identity and then attack the opposition as a mob. And the mob is indiscriminate. It just attacks any mob opposed to them. Conservative politics are the exact opposite. They focus on the individuality of the person. Each and every political battle is rooted in one of these two ideologies: The individual > than the state OR the state > than the individual. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Sept 25, 2022 13:24:07 GMT -8
"Too few individuals, and a people reverts to a mob" -Stilgar This is the main principle behind identity politics, which is what "woke" and Liberal politics are currently based on. Form the group under and identity and then attack the opposition as a mob. And the mob is indiscriminate. Conservative politics are the exact opposite. They focus on the individuality of the person. Each and every political battle is rooted in one of these two ideologies: The individual > than the state OR the state > than the individual. Stilgar a wise man. I've always been proud to be the lone dissenting voice sitting with a bunch of libs, all yelling at me. Like a pack of jackals. I do not need 'back up'. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Sept 25, 2022 13:26:00 GMT -8
You see this on DNCNN too-when they bring on a conservative (rarely), there's 4 libs debating him, interrupting, shouting.
Thats why Fox news has high ratings-they calmly debate libs one on one-and they have as many on as they can get. Its interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Sept 26, 2022 6:23:27 GMT -8
This is the main principle behind identity politics, which is what "woke" and Liberal politics are currently based on. Form the group under and identity and then attack the opposition as a mob. And the mob is indiscriminate. Conservative politics are the exact opposite. They focus on the individuality of the person. Each and every political battle is rooted in one of these two ideologies: The individual > than the state OR the state > than the individual. Stilgar a wise man. I've always been proud to be the lone dissenting voice sitting with a bunch of libs, all yelling at me. Like a pack of jackals. I do not need 'back up'. I used to get beat up and bullied from grade school on up. I never backed down. One of my bullies called me a 'loud mouth'. One day, I was in about grade 5 or 6 and he circled the school waiting for me to come out. I tried to trick him by using another exit, and ran home. He caught me about 30 seconds before my house. He jumped up and down on me until I spat blood. Probably was a nose bleed. At a high school reunion all my former bullies except this guy apologized to me. This guy was adamant that he didn't like me, even as an adult. I used to think he was right. That I was a 'loud mouth' but I've come to realize I never really speak out unless I think something is unfair. And then, when I think something is unfair I just refuse to back down. I've learned that most people aren't like that. They are, like you said, a pack of jackals. 40 years later, my high school bully continues to be the same person. He runs with the crowd, he bullied me on social media and he bought into everything the mainstream media fed him. He was proud to comply with what he was told to do by the government so he could do all of his activities. "Just do it" he said. "What's the big deal? You get to do what you want" There's always different types of people in the world but when it comes to not backing down there are two types, and one of them is not like the other. |
|
|
|
Post by barry on Oct 1, 2022 4:05:49 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by kav on Oct 1, 2022 18:18:10 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by barry on Oct 3, 2022 4:58:34 GMT -8
Washington Post Ignores Data to Claim Summers Are ‘…Hotter, Longer and More Dangerous’Figure 1 – online interactive companion tool provided with the WaPo story on summer temperatures. Note the tool only provides data back 50 years to 1972, while the entire temperature dataset extends back to 1895. The reason for the 50-year data limit is simple; had WaPo used the entire temperature dataset back to 1895, they would not be able to make the claim at all. The WaPo story chose average temperature data for the summer months. The full data set is plotted, as seen in Figure 2 below. With one simple change of the NOAA online temperature plotting tool, we can switch from average summer temperature to maximum summer temperatures. The results in Figure 3 speak clearly to that point. Once again, Figure 3 shows summer 1936 was the hottest in the U.S. at 2.92°F above the climate normal for maximum temperatures. 1934 was also hotter than the years WaPo cites using this metric. If you trusted WaPo and their 50-year cherry pick exercise, you would not know this.
|
|
