|
|
Post by kav on Nov 1, 2022 16:16:50 GMT -8
Grandfather drank a beer and ate a raw egg every day from the time he was very young man. Worked in the steel mills in Ohio. Died at 106, sound of mind and body. Just heart finally gave in. He was walking to the local watering stop when he dies. So.... Used to have a raw egg every day when I was a teenager. I worked out and heard they had lots of good stuff in 'em so I started having them every morning. I love my eggs soft and love dipping food in the yolk of a sunny side up egg. The myth that egg yolks are bad for you is ridiculous and harmful. It's a concentrated power food and feeds the nervous central system and building blocks of the body in a way that just vegetables can never do. when i worked out i made power shake put yougurt i froze, 3 eggs and yeast protein powder in blender and let er rip. i still remember the taste. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 1, 2022 16:33:23 GMT -8
Used to have a raw egg every day when I was a teenager. I worked out and heard they had lots of good stuff in 'em so I started having them every morning. I love my eggs soft and love dipping food in the yolk of a sunny side up egg. The myth that egg yolks are bad for you is ridiculous and harmful. It's a concentrated power food and feeds the nervous central system and building blocks of the body in a way that just vegetables can never do. when i worked out i made power shake put yougurt i froze, 3 eggs and yeast protein powder in blender and let er rip. i still remember the taste. Yes. I used yeast as a supplement. It has a distinctive taste. Some mornings it was raw egg with a bit of honey. Other mornings it was a shake. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 1, 2022 18:06:11 GMT -8
I'm going to use this thread to point out very obvious, bad and influential examples of gas lighting. You can read all the posts I've been putting in the "Canada is now Authoritarian" thread. There are many journalist articles cin that thread overing the inquisition into the PMs unsupported use of the Emergency (War) Act. Not one SINGLE police officer of ANY rank, whether Federal, Provincial or Civic level has said that the Freedom Convoy was a threat of any sort.  They HAVE testified that they 'could have' been a threat, but they all said there was no credible evidence that showed that they were up to mischief at any time. The head OPP officer plainly stated that with such a large group, you were going to have a few bad apples but the majority were just peaceful protesters. ----------------------------- Meanwhile, this mainstream / legacy newspaper goes on to paint the protesters as threatening. To anyone casually reading you'd buy their take on the story but if you read carefully, there is not one credible piece of evidence in the article showing they were a threat or that there was any ill doing. To support their case, they use short phrases from the testimony taken out of context but knowing this now, when you read the article you can clearly see that the article presents no proof at all. And the end goal of the article is to smear the leader of Trudeau's opposition. Why would they do that? As I've documented Trudeau has given the media $600MIL in support and is pledging more. The Toronto Star is not a small paper, and this bias is both evil and insidious. Where is Pierre Poilievre as the facts come out about the ‘Freedom Convoy’?So, where is the proof that the convoy was not 'all bouncy castles' and a threat? |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 1, 2022 18:17:07 GMT -8
The reason this stuff is important is because once you start to "see it" you can't "unsee it" You start to see the holes in the media and they glare out at you. Just like when you finally learn to detect restoration on a comic book. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Nov 1, 2022 18:18:12 GMT -8
I'm going to use this thread to point out very obvious, bad and influential examples of gas lighting. You can read all the posts I've been putting in the "Canada is now Authoritarian" thread. There are many journalist articles cin that thread overing the inquisition into the PMs unsupported use of the Emergency (War) Act. Not one SINGLE police officer of ANY rank, whether Federal, Provincial or Civic level has said that the Freedom Convoy was a threat of any sort. They HAVE testified that they 'could have' been a threat, but they all said there was no credible evidence that showed that they were up to mischief at any time. The head OPP officer plainly stated that with such a large group, you were going to have a few bad apples but the majority were just peaceful protesters. ----------------------------- Meanwhile, this mainstream / legacy newspaper goes on to paint the protesters as threatening. To anyone casually reading you'd buy their take on the story but if you read carefully, there is not one credible piece of evidence in the article showing they were a threat or that there was any ill doing. To support their case, they use short phrases from the testimony taken out of context but knowing this now, when you read the article you can clearly see that the article presents no proof at all. And the end goal of the article is to smear the leader of Trudeau's opposition. Why would they do that? As I've documented Trudeau has given the media $600MIL in support and is pledging more. The Toronto Star is not a small paper, and this bias is both evil and insidious. Where is Pierre Poilievre as the facts come out about the ‘Freedom Convoy’?So, where is the proof that the convoy was not 'all bouncy castles' and a threat? its amazing anyone can be a lib-you have to willfully ignore the obvious constantly. all to proclaim your 'virtue'. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Nov 4, 2022 11:16:53 GMT -8
Amazing how many details are actually verifiable and the mainstream won't report on ANY of them. But if there's a rumor that will help destroy the right, like the zip ties that were found in the Capitol protest (which were never used for a bad reason and the protestor actually turned them in to authorities so that they wouldn't get misused) then they twist it into armageddon. Great find! This just gets WEIRDER and WEIRDER. WTF??? I can't remember. Are the conspiracy theorists the ones who are telling the truth or making up the lies?  |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Nov 4, 2022 11:29:45 GMT -8
wait wut
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Dec 4, 2022 10:39:32 GMT -8
Amazing how many details are actually verifiable and the mainstream won't report on ANY of them. But if there's a rumor that will help destroy the right, like the zip ties that were found in the Capitol protest (which were never used for a bad reason and the protestor actually turned them in to authorities so that they wouldn't get misused) then they twist it into armageddon. Great find! This just gets WEIRDER and WEIRDER. WTF??? just an FYI, the Pelosi attacker story continues to unfold in weird ways. The reporter who above reported that Pelosi opened the door himself for police has not posted or been back to work since the story was quietly retracted without explanation. The reporter has been suspended. Weirder and weirder. www.foxnews.com/media/miguel-almaguer-remains-absent-from-nbc-since-stunning-paul-pelosi-attack-report-was-mysteriously-retracted |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Dec 4, 2022 10:40:53 GMT -8
After Google and the rest of big tech have spent the last few years censoring and gaslighting the largest stories in human history, they are now going to spend $12MIL on a 'fact checking global media network' |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Dec 4, 2022 15:13:50 GMT -8
Did you know that Facebook has a secret portal for governments to access for reporting misinformation? Neither did I, until I read this. From the article: "Facebook created a special portal for DHS and government partners to report disinformation directly." Truth Cops: Leaked Documents Outline DHS’s Plans to Police DisinformationThe Department of Homeland Security is quietly broadening its efforts to curb speech it considers dangerous, an investigation by The Intercept has found. Years of internal DHS memos, emails, and documents — obtained via leaks and an ongoing lawsuit, as well as public documents — illustrate an expansive effort by the agency to influence tech platforms. The work, much of which remains unknown to the American public, came into clearer view earlier this year when DHS announced a new “Disinformation Governance Board”: a panel designed to police misinformation (false information spread unintentionally), disinformation (false information spread intentionally), and malinformation (factual information shared, typically out of context, with harmful intent) that allegedly threatens U.S. interests. While the board was widely ridiculed, immediately scaled back, and then shut down within a few months, other initiatives are underway as DHS pivots to monitoring social media now that its original mandate — the war on terror — has been wound down. Behind closed doors, and through pressure on private platforms, the U.S. government has used its power to try to shape online discourse. According to meeting minutes and other records appended to a lawsuit filed by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, a Republican who is also running for Senate, discussions have ranged from the scale and scope of government intervention in online discourse to the mechanics of streamlining takedown requests for false or intentionally misleading information. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Dec 4, 2022 15:28:36 GMT -8
This is a great Washington Examiner article that summarizes how poorly the media has handled the Paul Pelosi attack. Will there be any media introspection over the Paul Pelosi story?It has been over a month since the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was attacked, spawning establishment media outrage over right-wing rhetoric, yet it still isn’t clear exactly what happened. If anything, establishment media have been making it harder to understand what happened. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Dec 4, 2022 15:32:37 GMT -8
This is a great Washington Examiner article that summarizes how poorly the media has handled the Paul Pelosi attack. Will there be any media introspection over the Paul Pelosi story?It has been over a month since the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was attacked, spawning establishment media outrage over right-wing rhetoric, yet it still isn’t clear exactly what happened. If anything, establishment media have been making it harder to understand what happened. n korea media seems to be more legitimate than ours. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Dec 6, 2022 17:30:54 GMT -8
Musk supports labelling "news" that is running on government funds.
As he should. They are nothing more than propaganda stations and the people need to know.
|
|
|
|
Post by kav on Dec 6, 2022 17:38:27 GMT -8
Musk supports labelling "news" that is running on government funds. As he should. They are nothing more than propaganda stations and the people need to know. why does only one side get publicly financed? liberal pbs and npr. WHY? why do libraries recommended reading shelves stock liberal books? why does everything government lean left? and by lean i mean totally left. |
|
|
|
Post by kav on Dec 6, 2022 20:31:41 GMT -8
love this guy. thats right mike we can talk abt joe rogan here.  |
|
