|
|
Post by Buzzetta on Sept 22, 2024 8:14:24 GMT -8
So basically, there is a message board to discuss what goes on at the message board that was originally created to discuss what goes on over at the CGC Message board. It's not a criticism but an observation. |
|
Cat
TCBF Member
Joined: October 2022
Posts: 238
|
Post by Cat on Sept 22, 2024 8:48:49 GMT -8
Suit yourself, Metal. By the way, I don't have the ability to make a decision regarding the immigration process, but I can put a whisper into the ear of one of those that do. That's all. Let's not overtalk it here. You'd have to be a pretty bad person for me to negatively interfere in the migration process to here. We're one of the greatest countries on Earth, everyone should be able to enjoy this country, no matter where you're from.
You've done a bit of research on Rockhampton. Did you learn about the statue of the bull, and the problem with its balls?
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Sept 22, 2024 17:12:28 GMT -8
MetalPSI: "I owe Roy a sincere apology He is right. Not about everything, but there is a lot of truth to some things he says. As huge as that ego is and as arrogant as he is. He isn't wrong." ------------------------------------- Thanks. I genuinely mean it, but I have no idea what you're talking about...although I do think I'm right about almost everything I get behind because I have very low self esteem and hate looking like a fool. I tend to not speak until I'm sure (this is all genuine - I'm not pulling anyone's leg here). So what are we actually talking, that I was right about?  BTW, I genuinely don't think I have a huge ego. It's mostly an act. An internet persona pr an avatar, meant to entertain, and I know it can sound arrogant to some who don't get the schtick, but in real talk I'm actually pretty quiet and demure, especially in debate. I think I'm actually a pretty good debater in private. My ex was a pro (philosophy major) and she always spoke highly of my debate skills between us. I think me pushing how right I am can make me sound arrogant, and I totally get that. It's not so much that I want to sound right, it's that I want everyone to actually agree and get along and sometimes I genuinely can't believe people don't see what I'm seeing...couple that with a little ADHD impatience, and things can get heated, but I've come to learn how everyone can see something different when looking at the same thing and so I've come a long way in the last few years in recognizing my role in things, after a lot of self reflection and work on myself, especially over the pandemic. I really do think you added to the heat and agitation over on the CGC boards, and I think you were one of the people in the WC that upped the temperature causing me to get banned, so it means a lot to me that you're at the very least trying to make amends. Anyway, I genuinely appreciate it. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 3, 2024 7:24:36 GMT -8
Things I've learned from 70 pages of discussion about Stan Lee and Jack Kirby on the CGC boards.
Kirby was spineless and always, only whined after the fact. He also contradicts himself a lot.
Stan Lee was only in the office 2 days a week because he was too busy pulling a 'Burt Reynolds' on his couch the rest of the time.
Stan Lee's wages in the 60's should be dictated by Larry Hama's wages in the 1970's. Sounds logical.
Marvel comics ran itself. In fact, I'm sure Kirby was doing that as well in the 1960's, only remotely, probably through a Boom Tube.
If the goal posts moved as much in soccer as they did in that discussion, every team would score 1000 points per game and neither team would lose.
Did I miss anything?
|
|
|
|
Post by Prince Namor on Oct 4, 2024 15:01:15 GMT -8
Things I've learned from 70 pages of discussion about Stan Lee and Jack Kirby on the CGC boards. Kirby was spineless and always, only whined after the fact. He also contradicts himself a lot. Stan Lee was only in the office 2 days a week because he was too busy pulling a 'Burt Reynolds' on his couch the rest of the time. Stan Lee's wages in the 60's should be dictated by Larry Hama's wages in the 1970's. Sounds logical. Marvel comics ran itself. In fact, I'm sure Kirby was doing that as well in the 1960's, only remotely, probably through a Boom Tube. If the goal posts moved as much in soccer as they did in that discussion, every team would score 1000 points per game and neither team would lose. Did I miss anything? The obvious, as usual. Stan Lee LIED. |
|
|
|
Post by Buzzetta on Oct 5, 2024 10:41:55 GMT -8
Things I've learned from 70 pages of discussion about Stan Lee and Jack Kirby on the CGC boards. Kirby was spineless and always, only whined after the fact. He also contradicts himself a lot. Stan Lee was only in the office 2 days a week because he was too busy pulling a 'Burt Reynolds' on his couch the rest of the time. Stan Lee's wages in the 60's should be dictated by Larry Hama's wages in the 1970's. Sounds logical. Marvel comics ran itself. In fact, I'm sure Kirby was doing that as well in the 1960's, only remotely, probably through a Boom Tube. If the goal posts moved as much in soccer as they did in that discussion, every team would score 1000 points per game and neither team would lose. Did I miss anything? Judging by the multiple posts made in the last 24hrs, you obviously missed the part where you said it was the last thing you were going to say on the issue. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 5, 2024 16:12:22 GMT -8
Things I've learned from 70 pages of discussion about Stan Lee and Jack Kirby on the CGC boards. Kirby was spineless and always, only whined after the fact. He also contradicts himself a lot. Stan Lee was only in the office 2 days a week because he was too busy pulling a 'Burt Reynolds' on his couch the rest of the time. Stan Lee's wages in the 60's should be dictated by Larry Hama's wages in the 1970's. Sounds logical. Marvel comics ran itself. In fact, I'm sure Kirby was doing that as well in the 1960's, only remotely, probably through a Boom Tube. If the goal posts moved as much in soccer as they did in that discussion, every team would score 1000 points per game and neither team would lose. Did I miss anything? The obvious, as usual. Stan Lee LIED. I had a long time, reasonable board member who never says anything of the sort publicly send me this in a message about you, unsolicited: "Yeah... my position has evolved on this guy. I don't think he's got all his marbles." And two of the people who have read your book didn't come to the same conclusions as you did. Your methodology for coming to conclusions is not reasonable or logical, and never has been and frankly, based on everything I've read, and in a court of law likely wouldn't stand up, because you only use information that supports one side. I know because I started writing a book like that on a different topic over 20 years ago. It was destroyed when my laptop was destroyed in a basement flood. I was tunnel visioned and about as biased and subjective as I could get. Personally, I think you're too emotionally invested in the topic to be reasonable and I'm telling you out of genuine intent that your writing style is not helping but I'll stop trying to help. If your friends were honest with you, they'd tell you the same. But you do you and enjoy the notoriety. |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Namor on Oct 5, 2024 21:48:06 GMT -8
The obvious, as usual. Stan Lee LIED. I had a long time, reasonable board member who never says anything of the sort publicly send me this in a message about you, unsolicited: "Yeah... my position has evolved on this guy. I don't think he's got all his marbles." You just have to have someones approval don't you? So unable to figure out things on your own. Once a cult member... And  that guy, who the hell is HE to judge anyone? He's friends with a nut case like YOU who was on Facebook talking about how Hitler was a socialist.  . My premise is Stan Lee LIED, which is as provable as the sky is UP. And two of the people who have read your book didn't come to the same conclusions as you did. False. No one has proven anything I've said is wrong. No one. Your methodology for coming to conclusions is not reasonable or logical, and never has been and frankly, based on everything I've read, and in a court of law likely wouldn't stand up, because you only use information that supports one side. I know because I started writing a book like that on a different topic over 20 years ago. It was destroyed when my laptop was destroyed in a basement flood. I was tunnel visioned and about as biased and subjective as I could get. You haven't read the book, how would you know? And you still have yet to name one specific thing I'm wrong about or show proof that I'm wrong. You just making sweeping generalizations. Personally, I think you're too emotionally invested in the topic to be reasonable and I'm telling you out of genuine intent that your writing style is not helping but I'll stop trying to help. If your friends were honest with you, they'd tell you the same. But you do you and enjoy the notoriety. You still have yet to name one specific thing I'm wrong about or show proof that I'm wrong. You just making sweeping generalizations. |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Namor on Oct 5, 2024 21:49:29 GMT -8
Things I've learned from 70 pages of discussion about Stan Lee and Jack Kirby on the CGC boards. Kirby was spineless and always, only whined after the fact. He also contradicts himself a lot. Stan Lee was only in the office 2 days a week because he was too busy pulling a 'Burt Reynolds' on his couch the rest of the time. Stan Lee's wages in the 60's should be dictated by Larry Hama's wages in the 1970's. Sounds logical. Marvel comics ran itself. In fact, I'm sure Kirby was doing that as well in the 1960's, only remotely, probably through a Boom Tube. If the goal posts moved as much in soccer as they did in that discussion, every team would score 1000 points per game and neither team would lose. Did I miss anything? Judging by the multiple posts made in the last 24hrs, you obviously missed the part where you said it was the last thing you were going to say on the issue. I keep waiting for Roy to say, "You promised you wouldn't fact check me!" |
|
|
|
Post by truthteller on Oct 6, 2024 14:17:20 GMT -8
Things I've learned from 70 pages of discussion about Stan Lee and Jack Kirby on the CGC boards. Kirby was spineless and always, only whined after the fact. He also contradicts himself a lot. Stan Lee was only in the office 2 days a week because he was too busy pulling a 'Burt Reynolds' on his couch the rest of the time. Stan Lee's wages in the 60's should be dictated by Larry Hama's wages in the 1970's. Sounds logical. Marvel comics ran itself. In fact, I'm sure Kirby was doing that as well in the 1960's, only remotely, probably through a Boom Tube. If the goal posts moved as much in soccer as they did in that discussion, every team would score 1000 points per game and neither team would lose. Did I miss anything? |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Namor on Oct 6, 2024 14:50:45 GMT -8
Things I've learned from 70 pages of discussion about Stan Lee and Jack Kirby on the CGC boards. Kirby was spineless and always, only whined after the fact. He also contradicts himself a lot. Stan Lee was only in the office 2 days a week because he was too busy pulling a 'Burt Reynolds' on his couch the rest of the time. Stan Lee's wages in the 60's should be dictated by Larry Hama's wages in the 1970's. Sounds logical. Marvel comics ran itself. In fact, I'm sure Kirby was doing that as well in the 1960's, only remotely, probably through a Boom Tube. If the goal posts moved as much in soccer as they did in that discussion, every team would score 1000 points per game and neither team would lose. Did I miss anything? While Stan Lee remained stateside, serving his country in an office. |
|
|
|
Post by Prince Namor on Oct 6, 2024 19:57:36 GMT -8
Roy wrote this and then erased it over at the CGC Boards... I caught it though: "Jack Kriby was eating the dogs long before the Haitians were. And he was a socialist who funded early development on Co-Vid. I have friends who have e-mailed me and they're very reasonable people and they told me. They tell me I'm very popular and smart and I have an ex who told me I was the smartest person in the world. So I know. And this PROVES Stan Lee created Thor." Now... am I lying? Your not sure are you? |
|
|
|
Post by truthteller on Oct 6, 2024 22:25:11 GMT -8
Roy wrote this and then erased it over at the CGC Boards... I caught it though: "Jack Kriby was eating the dogs long before the Haitians were. And he was a socialist who funded early development on Co-Vid. I have friends who have e-mailed me and they're very reasonable people and they told me. They tell me I'm very popular and smart and I have an ex who told me I was the smartest person in the world. So I know. And this PROVES Stan Lee created Thor." Now... am I lying? Your not sure are you?His ex couldn't wait to get away from him it seems. She found out. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 9, 2024 15:11:03 GMT -8
Kirby was spineless and always, only whined after the fact. He also contradicts himself a lot. He also apparently stood up to gangsters in the offices. But he was spineless when it came to standing up for his rights in the comic business, constantly running from one publisher to the next every time he was unhappy, and that is the only logical conclusion to the debate on the CGC boards in regards to Kirby's behavior and his choices. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Oct 9, 2024 15:12:28 GMT -8
Roy wrote this and then erased it over at the CGC Boards... I caught it though: "Jack Kriby was eating the dogs long before the Haitians were. And he was a socialist who funded early development on Co-Vid. I have friends who have e-mailed me and they're very reasonable people and they told me. They tell me I'm very popular and smart and I have an ex who told me I was the smartest person in the world. So I know. And this PROVES Stan Lee created Thor." Now... am I lying? Your not sure are you?You're. And everyone knows I wouldn't write that and even more, that I wouldn't erase something I wrote. I'm not the communist here.  |
|
that guy, who the hell is HE to judge anyone? He's friends with a nut case like YOU who was on Facebook talking about how Hitler was a socialist. 
.
