|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jul 6, 2021 22:32:23 GMT -8
A few very prominent (ie NOT quacks) professionals believe they've found an end to the pandemic.
I've done some listening (finally found the time) to some proper experts in regards to the Covid pandemic and ivermectin.
This video was banned from YouTube.
The irony of the banning from YouTube is that these are two highly regarded experts in their fields, BOTH of who are responsible for a lot of the positive work and care being given in regards to Covid.
Bret Weinstein conducts this interview. The other expert is Pierre Kory, who is a lifelong physician (lung expert) whose work over the course of the pandemic is actually responsible for much of the care that is being given today worldwide. These are not quacks. They're people who are highly regarded in their fields and at the forefront in the battle against Covid 19. The video is 2.5 hours long. I found a lot of things about this video fascinating and if it's too long for you then just give the first 20 mins a listen because it's eye opening. If you're not absolutely hooked after the first 20 mins I don't know what to say.  The most interesting thing about the 1st 20 mins was how they absolutely nailed the exact conflicts that we had in the Covid thread. Oh yeah, and their dialogue in the 1st 20 mins will basically show how ridiculous namisgr was with his crusade. 
Honestly, it's like they were talking about namisgr and his troops at the 18-20 min mark  Fascinating stuff. This is real news that is being suppressed.
As Pierre Kory says, he initially thought he was having a disagreement over data. No, they have the data.
What they are having a disagreement with is some unknown external force which is repelling, like gravity does to a planet, any arguments that are beneficial to the use of Ivermectin.
In short, these guys believe and have proven that Ivermectin is so powerful against Covid-19 (suppression in 86% of cases, enough to stop the spread of Covid) that they believe it could eradicate the virus without vaccines (although they are absolutely not anti vaccine) and they go into the reasons of how it works and why it's being suppressed.
This is a fascinating, truthful, authentic and real discussion about how the medical community is working against itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jul 13, 2021 12:32:43 GMT -8
There is a war being waged.
This video has been banned from social media platforms.
This is an interview on Bret Weinstein's Dark Horse Podcast.
Bret Weinstein is a world famous biologist (not a quack) who I came to know well he kept trying to blow the whistle on the possibility of a lab leak a year and a half ago and was suppressed and pushed back on by the media.
In this interview, he interviews Dr.Robert Malone, NOT A QUACK who is the INVENTOR of mRNA technology that is being used in the vaccines today.
The inventory of mRNA technology is being censored off of social media for talking about the tech.
Neither of these guys are anti -vaxx. Weinstein is vaccinated against things that some of us will never have to be, simply for his work in biology. The other guy spent a career working on vaccines.
These guys are anti lies and anti stupidity.
If you have 15 minutes to watch this video to understand the counter arguments about the vaccine from two highly qualified experts, one who created the technology they're using, do yourself a favor and have a listen.
Don't take it from me. Take it from the experts who have been doing this for their entire lives.
|
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Jul 14, 2021 6:09:47 GMT -8
Be cautious. I note that Donna has joined as a member here, and he might send you a pm Mod warning.
He has not posted yet, but....I think he misses you, since CGC is dying.
I wonder when he will post so I can welcome him as a member of an impartial forum, where all can voice their opinion without having to concern themselves with Mod Dodgeball.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jul 14, 2021 15:08:24 GMT -8
Be cautious. I note that Donna has joined as a member here, and he might send you a pm Mod warning. He has not posted yet, but....I think he misses you, since CGC is dying. I wonder when he will post so I can welcome him as a member of an impartial forum, where all can voice their opinion without having to concern themselves with Mod Dodgeball. Yeah, I saw that.
This site is so exciting that new members are joining! How wonderful!!
So, I just got wind of this. Apparently, there are parliament members in Canada pushing to get Trudeau to release documents on why 2 scientists were removed from a high security virology lab in Winnipeg.
For anyone that doesn't follow, there were scientists involved in work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and that story got quashed at the start of the pandemic.
From my perspective, Canada is by far the strictest country in the West as far as lockdown measures go and some are surmising that Trudeau may have some sort of reason to protect the Chinese CCCP.
The article does a good job outlining how Canadian politics differ from US politics and how Trudeau is NOT acting like a Canadian Prime Minister.
Documents related to the removal of two scientists from the federal high-security virology lab in Winnipeg – documents the opposition wants released, and the Trudeau government wants to withhold – are what film and theatre buffs will recognize as the MacGuffin of our story.
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jul 26, 2021 18:50:28 GMT -8
There is a war being waged.
This video has been banned from social media platforms.
This is an interview on Bret Weinstein's Dark Horse Podcast.
Bret Weinstein is a world famous biologist (not a quack) who I came to know well he kept trying to blow the whistle on the possibility of a lab leak a year and a half ago and was suppressed and pushed back on by the media.
In this interview, he interviews Dr.Robert Malone, NOT A QUACK who is the INVENTOR of mRNA technology that is being used in the vaccines today.
The inventory of mRNA technology is being censored off of social media for talking about the tech.
Neither of these guys are anti -vaxx. Weinstein is vaccinated against things that some of us will never have to be, simply for his work in biology. The other guy spent a career working on vaccines.
These guys are anti lies and anti stupidity.
If you have 15 minutes to watch this video to understand the counter arguments about the vaccine from two highly qualified experts, one who created the technology they're using, do yourself a favor and have a listen.
Don't take it from me. Take it from the experts who have been doing this for their entire lives.
The battle for Ivermectin continues.
This is a study on the use of Ivermectin showing it has increased benefits in treating Covid over a placebo group.
A separate Oxford study is still ongoing and I've been unable to find any early results from that trial (if anyone has any to share I'd love to see them)
The question Bret Weinstein and Pierre Kory have been asking is why the resistance to using or testing with it that nobody can answer except that it's not as profitable as other treatments.
This short 4 minute Joe Rogan clip condenses a much larger discussion that is being censored across the internet.
The problem is that the people that being censored are actual experts on what they're talking about.
Why are experts being censored?
Why is Fauci, the man who openly lied to the general ;public on more than occasion the de facto expert that we still listen to?
These are two questions worth asking and answering.
ttfitz does this sound like silencing to you? 
|
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jul 28, 2021 11:12:13 GMT -8
Bret Weinstein and Hether Heying discussing Vaccine Emergency Use Authorizatoin and Ivermectin
Emergency Use authorization was allowed for vaccines because there were apparently no other available / alternative treatments
If there was an alternative to vaccines they would not have been authorized for emergency use and allowed to be distributed without full approval.
The short story on Ivermectin has a lot of smoke and mirrors going on if you follow it closely (and follow the money)
Talking about Ivermectin as a treatment for Covid019 is specifically prohibited in Google's / YouTube's terms of service. 
So there is evidence that Ivermectin is safe (4 billion worldwide doses), there is evidence that it may work well against Covid-19 and warrants further study, it's cheap and easy to produce and nobody wants to look at it as a possible treatment for Covid-19
The question is, why have there not been more studies on Ivermectin, which is showing efficacy towards treating Covid-19 as both a treatment and a preventative and rather, why is even publicly talking about it being suppressed?
Just las the lab leak theory was suppressed heavily, and the suppression was being done by those who had the most to lose financially and credibly, there is a large suppression happening on the discussion of Ivermectin as a possible effective treatment.
Now why would anybody want to do that?
This video covers a lot of ground in 20 minutes and explains all of the above in an easy to understand discussion by two credible and trustworthy scientists.
|
|
|
|
Post by barry on Jul 29, 2021 7:41:19 GMT -8
The New York Times
OPINION
BRET STEPHENS
Covid Misinformation Comes From the Top, Too
July 27, 2021
"Fauci is almost certainly right on the technical merits … But the larger truth — obscured until recently by fervent efforts (including by Fauci) to dismiss the lab-leak theory for the origins of the pandemic — is that the U.S. government’s scientific establishment did support gain-of-function research that deserved far more public debate than it got," Stephens wrote. "Also incontrovertibly true is that beneficiaries of that funding engaged in deceptive tactics and outright mendacity to shield their research from public scrutiny while denouncing their critics as conspiracymongers."
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmers Nice Guy on Jul 29, 2021 12:07:33 GMT -8
Everybody wang chung tonight
|
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Jul 30, 2021 5:18:06 GMT -8
Everybody wang chung tonight That is not a side effect. Yet. |
|
|
|
Post by vintagecomics on Jul 30, 2021 13:42:18 GMT -8
The New York Times
OPINION
BRET STEPHENS
Covid Misinformation Comes From the Top, Too
July 27, 2021
"Fauci is almost certainly right on the technical merits … But the larger truth — obscured until recently by fervent efforts (including by Fauci) to dismiss the lab-leak theory for the origins of the pandemic — is that the U.S. government’s scientific establishment did support gain-of-function research that deserved far more public debate than it got," Stephens wrote. "Also incontrovertibly true is that beneficiaries of that funding engaged in deceptive tactics and outright mendacity to shield their research from public scrutiny while denouncing their critics as conspiracymongers."
Lying about the benefits of masks, asking Facebook to block posts about the lab leak theory to stifle discussion, lying about what 'gain of function' is. Yes, those in power at the highest seats of authority are working hard to try to spread their own misinformation.
Truth doesn't matter, only money and power does.
------------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, Statistics Canada just came out with a report that more Canadians under the age of 65 died from lockdown measures than from Covid-19 itself.
Where did the majority of all the other deaths come from? Mismanaging Long Term Care facilities.
And before you get on me for saying that True North is a biased, right leaning paper, well you can just read the Stats Can document on it's own.
|
|
|
|
Post by steveinthecity on Jul 31, 2021 9:47:22 GMT -8
------------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, Statistics Canada just came out with a report that more Canadians under the age of 65 died from lockdown measures than from Covid-19 itself.
Where did the majority of all the other deaths come from? Mismanaging Long Term Care facilities.
And before you get on me for saying that True North is a biased, right leaning paper, well you can just read the Stats Can document on it's own.
It makes sense that more people died as a result of a lockdown compared to a similar period pre-lockdown, but what would the mortality numbers have been in total without a lockdown during Covid? If behaviors were identical to those pre-Covid, wouldn’t the overall spread(deaths) of the virus be even greater? Removing quality of life issues from the argument, wouldn’t a “lockdown” be the lesser of two evils until we understood how to adapt to or manage the virus? If you take all or some portion of stability/responsibility from someone’s life(work, school, church, community activity, etc.) I suspect far more people will head in the direction of self-defeating behaviors rather than traditionally healthful ones. I’m not sure why the statement you highlighted(in bold, in blue) would even be controversial? |
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Jul 31, 2021 12:29:33 GMT -8
Roy, I am told you went and and tugged on Donna's short hairs, again, and he threw another tantrum and vacationed you again. I told you he was gunning for you. Weird it happened so quickly, for an innocent post, I am told, yet he lets the Dank dufus get away with the cnn reference in big red colors. I guess some of his wild and free pond fish died from the horrible global warming he is experiencing. Gets his tightey whiteys tighter. But, an Olympic tread? Really?
I note that tth is still at his all things American bashing. It amazes me he was not fragged in the military.
Hello to all my friends and admirers joining us from the Watercooler, rushing and falling all over themselves because they heard I posted, again.
This board needs the viewing business, so I thank you and am always available to entertain.
|
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Jul 31, 2021 12:32:25 GMT -8
------------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, Statistics Canada just came out with a report that more Canadians under the age of 65 died from lockdown measures than from Covid-19 itself.
Where did the majority of all the other deaths come from? Mismanaging Long Term Care facilities.
And before you get on me for saying that True North is a biased, right leaning paper, well you can just read the Stats Can document on it's own.
It makes sense that more people died as a result of a lockdown compared to a similar period pre-lockdown, but what would the mortality numbers have been in total without a lockdown during Covid? If behaviors were identical to those pre-Covid, wouldn’t the overall spread(deaths) of the virus be even greater? Removing quality of life issues from the argument, wouldn’t a “lockdown” be the lesser of two evils until we understood how to adapt to or manage the virus? If you take all or some portion of stability/responsibility from someone’s life(work, school, church, community activity, etc.) I suspect far more people will head in the direction of self-defeating behaviors rather than traditionally healthful ones. I’m not sure why the statement you highlighted(in bold, in blue) would even be controversial? Your if(s) and wouldn't(s) and suspect(s) premises are sorely lacking when discussing human behavior. |
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Jul 31, 2021 15:44:47 GMT -8
Roy, I am told you went and and tugged on Donna's short hairs, again, and he threw another tantrum and vacationed you again. I told you he was gunning for you. Weird it happened so quickly, for an innocent post, I am told, yet he lets the Dank dufus get away with the cnn reference in big red colors. I guess some of his wild and free pond fish died from the horrible global warming he is experiencing. Gets his tightey whiteys tighter. But, an Olympic tread? Really? I note that tth is still at his all things American bashing. It amazes me he was not fragged in the military. Hello to all my friends and admirers joining us from the Watercooler, rushing and falling all over themselves because they heard I posted, again. This board needs the viewing business, so I thank you and am always available to entertain. Awwwww, I hurt Dufus Dank's feelings. He mortified me and crushed my soul by posting wewy wewy bad silly wabbit tings on the moderation board, mommy. UP WITH CNN THERE, DANK. I AM A BELIEVER, BROTHER. ATTICA! ATTICA!! That tell it like it is/free speech/who cares I always say how I feel stuff you are always mouthing off about, and your cute demeaning of other posts, including your favorite target Roy, well, I agree. Welcome to free speech. Come on in, join and tell me how you really feel, instead of pouting. Those emojis really hoit, don't they? You were right to let Daddy Donna know. Can't have that on the Watercooler, can we? Pathetic, Dank, just pathetic for a grown man tough guy. Idea: push the report button, as you usually do. Who knows, maybe I will be contrite and humble. |
|
parker1865
TCBF Member
Joined: September 2018
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by parker1865 on Aug 1, 2021 8:24:15 GMT -8
Roy, I am told you went and and tugged on Donna's short hairs, again, and he threw another tantrum and vacationed you again. I told you he was gunning for you. Weird it happened so quickly, for an innocent post, I am told, yet he lets the Dank dufus get away with the cnn reference in big red colors. I guess some of his wild and free pond fish died from the horrible global warming he is experiencing. Gets his tightey whiteys tighter. But, an Olympic tread? Really? I note that tth is still at his all things American bashing. It amazes me he was not fragged in the military. Hello to all my friends and admirers joining us from the Watercooler, rushing and falling all over themselves because they heard I posted, again. This board needs the viewing business, so I thank you and am always available to entertain. Awwwww, I hurt Dufus Dank's feelings. He mortified me and crushed my soul by posting wewy wewy bad silly wabbit tings on the moderation board, mommy. UP WITH CNN THERE, DANK. I AM A BELIEVER, BROTHER. ATTICA! ATTICA!! That tell it like it is/free speech/who cares I always say how I feel stuff you are always mouthing off about, and your cute demeaning of other posts, including your favorite target Roy, well, I agree. Welcome to free speech. Come on in, join and tell me how you really feel, instead of pouting. Those emojis really hoit, don't they? You were right to let Daddy Donna know. Can't have that on the Watercooler, can we? Pathetic, Dank, just pathetic for a grown man tough guy. Idea: push the report button, as you usually do. Who knows, maybe I will be contrite and humble. Hi Swed! I mean Stu. Thanks for posting my post on the WC. I really would have preferred that Dank join here, though, and help the Board active membership count. One slight correction: I enjoy comics and always have. I do have one regret, and that is a large giveaway a while back included Donna being the recipient of a very nice prize. I did regret it did not go to a young collector, but I did not want to be a curmudgeon and cancel him, as he does others. You never know who does what and who likes different things. I do understand your die on Christmas stance concerning coin collectors, though. No harm no foul. Watch and participate in the next giveaway....you never know, you may just get a nice win courtesy of me. BTW, Hi Dank. Glad you made your new friend Stu. You both have something in common, you both can't stand me. Your friendship should last a long time, when built on such a strong foundation. |
|
