darthlego
I made my first post!
Joined: September 2017
Posts: 1
|
Post by darthlego on Sept 8, 2017 21:35:02 GMT -8
Will anyone openly talk about pressing here? Because it's hard to find places to actually acquire good knowledge about the topic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2017 7:08:02 GMT -8
Sure, I will. I've pressed several thousand books over the last 7 years, and have gotten results that has pleased most of my customers. I'm firmly of the opinion, through experience, that good pressing is far more than just having the right equipment and the right "recipes"...it takes the proper temperament, talent, wisdom, and discipline to do it well. Any  can toss a book into a press...that's not hard. But gently coaxing a book into doing what you want it to, while simultaneously avoiding additional damage, is a skill that not many people have, or, more importantly, can develop. A lot of people don't know what they're doing, and many don't know what they're talking about. For example: a poster on the CBCS board, who does not press, and, to my knowledge, has never pressed, attempted to call me out because I stated that usually some form of moisture is used in the process. However, as paper conservationists have known for decades, if not centuries, moisture, some form of humidity, is necessary to relax the cellulose fibers which makes up paper. In this book, for example, they discuss techniques for flattening rolled paper: books.google.com/books/about/Preservation_and_Conservation_for_Librar.html?id=IXRDD2npRboCAnd here, the National Park Service (oddly enough) discusses different methods of humidification: www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/13-02.pdfAnd, here, a conservator discusses bathing fine art (yes, BATHING!): hammer.ucla.edu/blog/2016/09/learning-from-our-paper-conservator/And, of course, the gut-bending saga of how to flatten painted paper...including (GASP!) watercolors: www.strathmoreartist.com/blog-reader/how-to-flatten-a-buckled-painting.htmlAnd, of course, moisture is used in the process to MAKE paper in the first place. What was frustrating, to a small degree, is that in that conservation, no one else...not even the supposed "professional" presser...said anything to this person, withholding information out of a combination of personal animus and professional jealousy (that is, jealously guarding "how to" information), instead of acknowledging that, yes, this is indeed part of the process. That attitude is what does the most damage, because erroneous information not challenged spreads and becomes entrenched in the minds of some. In that specific case, how many people will say "oh, well, so and so replied to such and such that you never introduce moisture to a book, and I don't like such and such, so so and so must be right"...even subconsciously? And, someone who may, in fact, have become a quality presser is severely hampered by the ignorant assertions of someone, which assertions aren't challenged by anyone else, even the so-called "professionals", and bad or inferior results are inevitable. But I'm willing to share a good deal of information, because...again...a great presser is born, not made. And pressing is just barely scratching the surface of paper conservation, which is a rich and deep field of study. People spend their whole lives learning and improving techniques for paper conservation. It is, in my opinion, a fascinating and rewarding field.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Sept 9, 2017 7:30:38 GMT -8
I believe that pressing should have been considered restoration from day one. It was considered restoration from day one, then CGC/Steve Borock came to town and told everybody it was perfectly acceptable and they bought it. Now there's an entire industry devoted to the pressing of books to increase the "value". If what you say jokingly here had actually happened, I would be more accepting of pressing. I would respect CGC and Borock more if they had actually announced in 2000 the fact that pressing wouldn't be given a purple label. It's not that their customers bought it, since the customers didn't even know it was happening. CGC serruptitiously and with malice of forethought ( part of their CPR strategy) forced the community to accept pressing using subterfuge, sins of omission, and underhanded measures. Letting select dealers like Matt Nelson in on the secret only added to CGC's bull  . When people found out about this, CGC was like too bad so sad, we've been slabbing tons of pressed books before you found out, live with it. CGC never considered the hobby's best interest, only their own financial interests. Borock is s greedy prick, always has been. He's fooled many people into thinking he's not. I thought there was some hope when CGC had to shut down PCS because of outcries from the hobby. PCS was of course CGC's secret restoration/conservation company that invited select dealers to try out their services if the dealer signed a DNP. But all CGC had to do was wait until the new crop of variant  and speculating  outnumbered the real collectors and bam, we have Matt Nelson right down the hall from CGC. CGC didn't clean up comic's "wild west" problem, they made it worse in the name of the almighty dollar.
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on Sept 9, 2017 7:48:25 GMT -8
This is a good discussion.
I'm probably going to remain silent on the subject for various reasons, but I encourage you all to flesh this out as much as you want. At the very least, I think there's a need for some basic guidance to avoid damaging comic books - especially given the rise in the use of pressing over the last few years. In the past, I've seen novices and so-called 'experts' alike make serious mistakes due to a lack of education and experience, so I think it's a great topic of discussion.
Note: I was going to spend a little time reorganizing this forum today. I intend to break out 'Grading & Restoration' from the general section to give it more emphasis, so I will probably move this thread to that section when I get done.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Sept 9, 2017 9:42:27 GMT -8
I'm probably going to remain silent on the subject for various reasons,... Really? Can I ask why? Are you a "professional" presser?
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Sept 9, 2017 10:08:39 GMT -8
What was frustrating, to a small degree, is that in that conservation, no one else...not even the supposed "professional" presser...said anything to this person, withholding information out of a combination of personal animus and professional jealousy (that is, jealously guarding "how to" information), instead of acknowledging that, yes, this is indeed part of the process. That attitude is what does the most damage, because erroneous information not challenged spreads and becomes entrenched in the minds of some. What damage do you speak of? Damage to the presser's wallet? If you mean damage to the institution of pressing, then I'm all for it. Then in this case misinformation is a good thing. I hope more potentially good pressers initially mess up so bad they leave the hobby entirely. The less pressers the better (which is true even if you're pro-pressing). I love the spin here. Yeah, all those guys on the slab company boards are worried about long-term paper conservation  Is the Library of Congress pressing comic books now?
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on Sept 9, 2017 13:52:08 GMT -8
I'm probably going to remain silent on the subject for various reasons,... Really? Can I ask why? Are you a "professional" presser? It's not a secret or anything, but it would take me too long to explain and I'm too lazy. And no, I've never been a 'professional' presser...nor would I ever want to be. When done correctly, pressing is labor intensive. Even if you fired up 20 presses every day and fed them constantly...you're working cheap.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Sept 9, 2017 14:46:40 GMT -8
Really? Can I ask why? Are you a "professional" presser? It's not a secret or anything, but it would take me too long to explain and I'm too lazy. Cool, I'm never sure what's secret and what's not with you. Is there somewhere I can read about your feelings on pressing? Is there a Cliff's Notes version?
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Sept 9, 2017 14:48:49 GMT -8
Will anyone openly talk about pressing here? Because it's hard to find places to actually acquire good knowledge about the topic. Ah, now I see what's going on. Welcome to the boards!
|
|
|
Post by Siggy's Tar Dust® on Sept 9, 2017 15:04:48 GMT -8
I believe that pressing should have been considered restoration from day one. Other than having one corner of one book spot pressed prior to buying it, I haven't pressed anything. I have thought about it though. It IS restoration. I love pressing, especially high grade Silver Age books. It amazes me what's possible. I am blown away that a book that is an 8.0, for example, can become a 9.4. When I went over results with customers, I was always tickled pink when we got exceptionally good results...not because I was bragging about my skill, but because it was POSSIBLE in the first place. It's the same feeling one gets when restoring a classic car: to be able to make it look like it did when it was brand new. There's something very thrilling about that. The type of resto, however, is called market acceptable restoration. It doesn't add or take away anything, so it's not anywhere near as invasive as other forms. But, no doubt, it is restoration. I'm a firm believer this book would CPR to a 9.2- The right side looks like edge tears, but it's just uneven because it needs a press. Lousy pic- I really need a slab friendly, legal size printer. {Spoiler} 
|
|
|
Post by Siggy's Tar Dust® on Sept 9, 2017 15:15:45 GMT -8
And by the time I actually get to thinking about doing it, it'll probably cost more to do so 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2017 17:29:41 GMT -8
What was frustrating, to a small degree, is that in that conservation, no one else...not even the supposed "professional" presser...said anything to this person, withholding information out of a combination of personal animus and professional jealousy (that is, jealously guarding "how to" information), instead of acknowledging that, yes, this is indeed part of the process. That attitude is what does the most damage, because erroneous information not challenged spreads and becomes entrenched in the minds of some. What damage do you speak of? Damage to the presser's wallet? If you mean damage to the institution of pressing, then I'm all for it. I thought I explained it pretty well...it's the part that follows "because"...here, I'll paste it: "because erroneous information not challenged spreads and becomes entrenched in the minds of some." ...and the damage is damaged books, and people who might otherwise be high quality pressers being held back. That's a stupid argument. If you don't like restoration, you'd better find a new hobby, which only consists of you buying new things straight off the shelf. You can call it "spin" all you want; paper conservation was a "thing" for a hundred years prior to slabbing, and will be a thing for hundreds of years after the last comic has disintegrated into dust. I don't give two  s about other people on slab company boards and their motives; I only care about MY motives. You can continue to  on pressing; the reality is, however, that restoration of all kinds, including pressing, is just as valid and legitimate an endeavor as restoring cars, houses, paintings, tapestries, and the like. Is there financial motive for doing so? Of course. There's also financial motive to get up and go to work in the morning. That doesn't mean you can't love your work, too, or that you're a sellout if you don't and are just doing it for the money.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Sept 10, 2017 15:54:31 GMT -8
It's not a secret or anything, but it would take me too long to explain and I'm too lazy. Cool, I'm never sure what's secret and what's not with you. Is there somewhere I can read about your feelings on pressing? Is there a Cliff's Notes version? Bump for Ditch.
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on Sept 10, 2017 15:58:29 GMT -8
This thread was seriously going Off-Topic so I moved the OT posts to The Off-Topic Thread in the moderation area. You guys can continue to fight in there if you want...knock yourselves out...just don't do it in here. Help make America great again...keep it neat and tidy...one thread at a time.
|
|
|
Post by Ditch Fahrenheit on Sept 10, 2017 17:02:42 GMT -8
Cool, I'm never sure what's secret and what's not with you. Is there somewhere I can read about your feelings on pressing? Is there a Cliff's Notes version? Bump for Ditch. No...I've never talked about it. Here's the outline version: The emergence of commercial grading companies begged the question of restoration detection levels. I'm a curious fellow and it seemed fun, so I devised various tests to determine some of these levels. During this process, I taught myself new skills through design of experiment. Pressing was one of those skills, and I became extremely proficient. Once I learned what I needed, I stopped. Part of what I learned prevents me from investing in comics. My feelings about pressing in the hobby are a little complex. I like the fact that a book can be made more presentable through pressing. I dislike improper pressing which damages the book, or adds observable defects to the book, or changes the book from its natural state (elimination of spine bloom for example). I also dislike how pressing is now omnipresent in the quest for slightly higher grades which net huge returns. Almost everything of value is pressed now, even when the probability of an increase in grade is low or nonexistent. But until the price bubble bursts, and it will eventually, pressing will continue to be a huge part of the monetary side of this hobby. No amount of discussion will change that.
|
|